Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27438878›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Diffusive Silicon Nanopore Membranes for Hemodialysis Applications.

Steven Kim, Benjamin Feinberg, Rishi Kant, Benjamin Chui, Ken Goldman, Jaehyun Park, Willieford Moses, Charles Blaha, Zohora Iqbal, Clarence Chow and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Sterilization effects on ultrathin film polymer coatings for silicon-based implantable medical devices.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2018
    Article
  17. Protein Separation and Hemocompatibility of Nitride Membranes in Microfluidic Filtration Systems.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2018
    Article
  18. Haemodialysis membranes.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Steven KimDivision of Nephrology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Benjamin FeinbergDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Rishi KantDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Benjamin ChuiBen Chui Consulting, Sunnyvale, California, United States of America.
Ken GoldmanH-Cubed, Olmsted Falls, Ohio, United States of America.
Jaehyun ParkDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Willieford MosesDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Charles BlahaDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Zohora IqbalDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Clarence ChowDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Nathan WrightDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
William H FissellSilicon Kidney, LLC, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Andrew ZydneyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Shuvo RoyDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
University of California, San Francisco · USH-Cubed (United States) · USPennsylvania State University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Building an Implantable Artificial KidneyU01EB021214 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FISSELL, WILLIAM H, ROY, SHUVO · 2015 to 2018
$6.0M
Biocompatibility of Implantable Renal Replacement DevicesR01EB014315 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROY, SHUVO · 2012 to 2015
$2.3M
The Interaction between Mircroenvironments and Hemocompatibility in End Stage Renal Disease PatientsF32DK103468 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KIM, STEVEN H. · 2014 to 2014
$65k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014315NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB021214NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK103468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemodialysis using hollow-fiber membranes provides life-sustaining treatment for nearly 2 million patients worldwide with end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, patients on hemodialysis have worse long-term outcomes compared to kidney transplant or other chronic illnesses. Additionally, the underlying membrane technology of polymer hollow-fiber membranes has not fundamentally changed in over four decades. Therefore, we have proposed a fundamentally different approach using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) fabrication techniques to create thin-flat sheets of silicon-based membranes for implantable or portable hemodialysis applications. The silicon nanopore membranes (SNM) have biomimetic slit-pore geometry and uniform pores size distribution that allow for exceptional permeability and selectivity. A quantitative diffusion model identified structural limits to diffusive solute transport and motivated a new microfabrication technique to create SNM with enhanced diffusive transport. We performed in vitro testing and extracorporeal testing in pigs on prototype membranes with an effective surface area of 2.52 cm2 and 2.02 cm2, respectively. The diffusive clearance was a two-fold improvement in with the new microfabrication technique and was consistent with our mathematical model. These results establish the feasibility of using SNM for hemodialysis applications with additional scale-up.

Indexed as

Membranes, ArtificialNanoporesAnimalsDiffusionHumansKidney Failure, ChronicPolymersRenal DialysisSiliconSolutionsSwineMembranes, ArtificialPolymersSiliconSolutions

Identifiers

PMID27438878
PMCPMC4954641
OpenAlexW2493679865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.