ArticleNeuroradiology2016
Brain imaging with synthetic MR in children: clinical quality assessment.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Focused Abbreviated Survey Technique (FAST) brain magnetic resonance imaging in children: results from a European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- 3D-QALAS synthetic MRI with Zero-DeepSub in children: initial experience including post-contrast imaging feasibility.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Clinical Image Quality and Reader Variability in 3D Synthetic Brain MRI Compared with Conventional MRI.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging Reader Study on Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity Using Synthetic MRI Based on MR Quantification.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Synthetic MR: Clinical applications in neuroradiology.Neuroradiology · 2025Review
- Quantitative evaluation of meniscus injury using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Potential clinical feasibility of synthetic MRI in bladder tumors: a comparative study with conventional MRI.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Glymphatic system dysfunction in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia without clinically diagnosed central nervous system infiltration: a novel DTI-ALPS method.European radiology · 2023Article
- Synthetic MRI plus FSE-PROPELLER DWI for differentiating malignant from benign head and neck tumors: a preliminary study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Assessment of 2D conventional and synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis.Neuroradiology · 2022Article
- Characterization of meningiomas with synthetic imaging.Brain and behavior · 2022Article
- Quantitative Synthetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Brain Metastases: A Feasibility Study.Cancers · 2022Article
- Synthetic MRI, multiplexed sensitivity encoding, and BI-RADS for benign and malignant breast cancer discrimination.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Relaxation time of brain tissue in the elderly assessed by synthetic MRI.Brain and behavior · 2022Article
- The Effect of Intraventricular Hemorrhage on Brain Development in Premature Infants: A Synthetic MRI Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Comparison between synthetic and conventional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis and controls.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Synthetic MRI of Preterm Infants at Term-Equivalent Age: Evaluation of Diagnostic Image Quality and Automated Brain Volume Segmentation.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Article
- Evaluating Tissue Contrast and Detecting White Matter Injury in the Infant Brain: A Comparison Study of Synthetic Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Double-inversion recovery with synthetic magnetic resonance: a pilot study for assessing synovitis of the knee joint compared to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.European radiology · 2019Article
- Clinical feasibility of 1-min ultrafast brain MRI compared with routine brain MRI using synthetic MRI: a single center pilot study.Journal of neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSynthetic magnetic resonance imaging is a quantitative imaging technique that measures inherent T1-relaxation, T2-relaxation, and proton density. These inherent tissue properties allow synthesis of various imaging sequences from a single acquisition. Clinical use of synthetic MR imaging has been described in adult populations. However, use of synthetic MR imaging has not been previously reported in children. The purpose of this study is to report our assessment of diagnostic image quality using synthetic MR imaging in children.
methodsSynthetic MR acquisition was obtained in a sample of children undergoing brain MR imaging. Image quality assessments were performed on conventional and synthetic T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. Standardized linear measurements were performed on conventional and synthetic T2 images. Estimates of patient age based upon myelination patterns were also performed.
resultsConventional and synthetic MR images were evaluated on 30 children. Using a 4-point assessment scale, conventional imaging performed better than synthetic imaging for T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. When the assessment was simplified to a dichotomized scale, the conventional and synthetic T1-weighted and T2-weighted images performed similarly. However, the superiority of conventional FLAIR images persisted in the dichotomized assessment. There were no statistically significant differences between linear measurements made on T2-weighted images. Estimates of patient age based upon pattern of myelination were also similar between conventional and synthetic techniques.
conclusionSynthetic MR imaging may be acceptable for clinical use in children. However, users should be aware of current limitations that could impact clinical utility in the software version used in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27438803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.