Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27438691›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical oncology2018

A Phase II Study to Prevent Radiation-induced Rectal Injury With Lovastatin.

Mitchell S Anscher, Michael G Chang, Drew Moghanaki, Mihaela Rosu, Ross B Mikkelsen, Diane Holdford, Vicki Skinner, Baruch M Grob, Arun Sanyal, Aiping Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Rectal Epithelial Stem Cell Kinetics in Acute Radiation Proctitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mitchell S AnscherDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Michael G ChangDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Drew MoghanakiDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Mihaela RosuDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Ross B MikkelsenDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Diane HoldfordThe Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Vicki SkinnerThe Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Baruch M GrobSurgery.
Arun SanyalMedicine.
Aiping WangBiostatistics.
Nitai D MukhopadhyayBiostatistics.
Radiation Oncology Associates · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USHunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Keri R Maher · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhysician reported symptomatic late rectal injury occurs in about 5% to 25% of patients treated with radiation therapy for prostate cancer, depending on the treatment technique. Patients, however, report clinically meaningful declines in bowel/rectal function regardless of the technique used. Lovastatin has been shown to protect mice from late radiation injury. This study was designed to determine if lovastatin might reduce the incidence of late rectal injury in patients receiving radiation therapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate receiving radiotherapy with curative intent were eligible. A portion of the rectum had to receive at least 60 Gy. Gastrointestinal functioning was assessed using both physician-reported and patient-reported instruments at baseline and at prescribed intervals during and after treatment. Lovastatin (20 to 80 mg/d) was started on day 1 of radiation and continued for 12 months. Patients were followed for an additional 12 months. The primary endpoint was physician-reported rectal toxicity ≥grade 2 during the first 2 years after treatment.

resultsA total of 20/53 (38%) patients developed grade 2 or higher toxicity during the 2-year follow-up period. Seventeen patients had 1 or more unresolved gastrointestinal symptom at the end of 2 years, 3 (6%) of which were grade 2 and none were of higher grade.

conclusionsThe primary endpoint of the study was not met. Lovastatin, as administered in this trial, did not reduce the incidence of grade 2 or higher rectal toxicity compared with historical controls.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overAnticholesteremic AgentsCase-Control StudiesFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansLovastatinMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRadiation ProtectionRadiotherapy, ConformalAnticholesteremic AgentsLovastatin

Identifiers

PMID27438691
PMCPMC5247423
OpenAlexW2484449763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.