Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27438016›Full record

ReviewJournal of innate immunity2016

What Really Rigs Up RIG-I?

Sailen Barik

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of innate immunity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Journal of Innate Immunity Ten Years Later.Journal of innate immunity · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. mBio · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. On PAMPs and DAMPs.Journal of innate immunity · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sailen BarikDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, and Center for Gene Regulation in Health and Disease, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Cleveland State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RIG-I (retinoic acid-inducible gene 1) is an archetypal member of the cytoplasmic DEAD-box dsRNA helicase family (RIG-I-like receptors or RLRs), the members of which play essential roles in the innate immune response of the metazoan cell. RIG-I functions as a pattern recognition receptor that detects nonself RNA as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP). However, the exact molecular nature of the viral RNAs that act as a RIG-I ligand has remained a mystery and a matter of debate. In this article, we offer a critical review of the actual viral RNAs that act as PAMPs to activate RIG-I, as seen from the perspective of a virologist, including a recent report that the viral Leader-read-through transcript is a novel and effective RIG-I ligand.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsDEAD Box Protein 58DEAD-box RNA HelicasesGene Expression Regulation, ViralHumansReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, Pattern RecognitionRNA, ViralVirus DiseasesVirusesDEAD Box Protein 58DEAD-box RNA HelicasesReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, Pattern RecognitionRIGI protein, humanRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID27438016
PMCPMC6738806
OpenAlexW2478201235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.