Trial reportJAMA cardiology2016
Intracoronary Gene Transfer of Adenylyl Cyclase 6 in Patients With Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase I/II Study AC6 Gene Transfer for Congestive Heart Failure
Randomized, Phase 3, Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial of a One Time Intracoronary Administration of Ad5.hAC6 Gene Transfer for Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Heart Failure
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence, timing, and clinical significance of adverse immune events after gene replacement therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Annexin A4 Deficient Ventricular Myocytes Display Advanced Hypertrophy and Electrical Remodeling With Chronic β-Adrenoceptor Stimulation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- Biologics for cardiovascular diseases: from bench to bedside.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Past, Present and Future of Regenerative Gene Therapy for Ischemic Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- Gene Therapy for Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- Calcium dysregulation in diabetic cardiomyopathy & heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Current Achievements in Gene Therapy Strategies and Delivery Systems in Preclinical and Clinical Models of Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
- Cardiotropic AAV gene therapy for heart failure: a phase 1 trial.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Autonomic dysregulation and atrial arrhythmias.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2025Review
- Targeting Calcium Regulation for Heart Failure and Arrhythmia Therapeutics: A Critical Review.Circulation · 2025Review
- Sympathetic Nervous System in Heart Failure: Targets for Treatments.Current hypertension reports · 2025Review
- Survivin in cardiovascular diseases and its therapeutic potential.Vascular pharmacology · 2025Review
- Gene therapy then and now: A look back at changes in the field over the past 25 years.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Nanodomain cAMP signaling in cardiac pathophysiology: potential for developing targeted therapeutic interventions.Physiological reviews · 2025Review
- AAV viral vectors as therapeutic interventions for inherited or non-inherited cardiac disorders: current aspects and future prospects.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- The calcium awakens: new insights in cardiac gene therapy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Hypoxia-responsive zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 2 (ZEB2) regulates a network of calcium-handling genes in the injured heart.Cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- Gene therapy for atrial fibrillation.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2024Review
- Review
- Gene Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: Clinical Perspectives.Yonsei medical journal · 2024Review
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceGene transfer has rarely been tested in randomized clinical trials.
objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of intracoronary delivery of adenovirus 5 encoding adenylyl cyclase 6 (Ad5.hAC6) in heart failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in US medical centers (randomization occurred from July 19, 2010, to October 30, 2014). Participants 18 to 80 years with symptomatic heart failure (ischemic and nonischemic) and an ejection fraction (EF) of 40% or less were screened; 86 individuals were enrolled, and 56 were randomized. Data analysis was of the intention-to-treat population. Participants underwent exercise testing and measurement of left ventricular EF (echocardiography) and then cardiac catheterization, where left ventricular pressure development (+dP/dt) and decline (-dP/dt) were recorded. Participants were randomized (3:1 ratio) to receive 1 of 5 doses of intracoronary Ad5.hAC6 or placebo. Participants underwent a second catheterization 4 weeks later for measurement of dP/dt. Exercise testing and EF were assessed 4 and 12 weeks after randomization.
interventionsIntracoronary administration of Ad5.hAC6 (3.2 × 109 to 1012 virus particles) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end points included exercise duration and EF before and 4 and 12 weeks after randomization and peak rates of +dP/dt and -dP/dt before and 4 weeks after randomization. Fourteen placebo participants were compared (intention to treat) with 24 Ad5.hAC6 participants receiving the highest 2 doses (D4 + 5).
resultsFifty-six individuals were randomized and monitored for up to 1 year. Forty-two participants (75%) received Ad5.hAC6 (mean [SE] age, 63 [1] years; EF, 30% [1%]), and 14 individuals (25%) received placebo (age, 62 [1] years; EF, 30% [2%]). Exercise duration showed no significant group differences (4 weeks, P = .27; 12 weeks, P = .47, respectively). The D4 + 5 participants had increased EF at 4 weeks (+6.0 [1.7] EF units; n = 21; P < .004), but not 12 weeks (+3.0 [2.4] EF units; n = 21; P = .16). Placebo participants showed no increase in EF at 4 weeks or 12 weeks. Exercise duration showed no between-group differences (4-week change from baseline: placebo, 27 [36] seconds; D4 + 5, 44 [25] seconds; P = .27; 12-week change from baseline: placebo, 44 [28] seconds; D4 + 5, 58 [29 seconds, P = .47). AC6 gene transfer increased basal left ventricular peak -dP/dt (4-week change from baseline: placebo, +93 [51] mm Hg/s; D4 + 5, -39 [33] mm Hg/s; placebo [n = 21]; P < .03); AC6 did not increase arrhythmias. The admission rate for patients with heart failure was 9.5% (4 of 42) in the AC6 group and 28.6% (4 of 14) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.08-1.36]; P = .10). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: AC6 gene transfer safely increased LV function beyond standard heart failure therapy, attainable with one-time administration. Larger trials are warranted.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00787059.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.