ArticleJAMA cardiology2016
Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Cardiovascular Events in Black Adults: The Jackson Heart Study Cohort.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Simple Model for Predicting 10-Year Cardiovascular Risk in Middle-Aged to Older Chinese: Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2022Trial
- Interpretable machine learning for cardiovascular disease risk prediction in cancer survivors: development and internal validation.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Validation Studies.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Ultrasound in cardiovascular care: a perspective on preventive, diagnostic, and monitoring applications.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- An American Story of a Health System Dilemma: The Slave Health Deficit and Post-Traumatic Slavery Stress Disorder (PTSSD).Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Associations between potassium, arterial stiffness, and risk of cardiovascular disease in the Jackson Heart Study: Potassium, arterial stiffness, and CVD risk.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Racial and regional disparities in the risk of noncommunicable disease between sub-Saharan black and European white patients.Journal of hypertension · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction Model for the Japanese Working Population: The Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Article
- Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds and Blood Pressure in NHANES 2011 to 2018.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025Article
- Urinary Volatile Organic Compound Metabolites are Associated with High Blood Pressure Among Non-smoking Participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2018).medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Impact of Race on Classification of Atherosclerotic Risk Using a National Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Tool.AJPM focus · 2024Article
- Do Police Encounters Increase the Risk for Cardiovascular Disease? Police Encounters and Framingham 30-Year Cardiovascular Risk Score.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Article
- Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds Is Associated with Hypertension in Black Adults: The Jackson Heart Study.Environmental research · 2023Article
- Measures of Food Inadequacy and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Black Individuals in the US From the Jackson Heart Study.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Article
- A Framework for Interfacing and Partnering with Environmental Justice Communities as a Prelude to Human Health and Hazard Identification in the Vulnerable Census Tracts of Columbus, Ohio.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Patients phenotypes and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes: the Jackson Heart Study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2022Article
- Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment: An American Society for Preventive Cardiology clinical practice statement.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2022Article
- The accelerated aging phenotype: The role of race and social determinants of health on aging.Ageing research reviews · 2022Review
- Application of a Lifestyle-Based Score to Predict Cardiovascular Risk in African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceCardiovascular risk assessment is a fundamental component of prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, commonly used prediction models have been formulated in primarily or exclusively white populations. Whether risk assessment in black adults is dissimilar to that in white adults is uncertain.
objectivesTo develop and validate risk prediction models for CVD incidence in black adults, incorporating standard risk factors, biomarkers, and subclinical disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThe Jackson Heart Study (JHS), a longitudinal community-based study of 5301 black adults in Jackson, Mississippi. Inclusive study dates were the date of a participant's first visit (September 2000 to March 2004) to December 31, 2011. The median (75th percentile) follow-up was 9.1 (9.7) years. The dates of the analysis were August 2013 to May 2015. Measurements included standard risk factors, including age, sex, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, ratio of fasting total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, estimated glomerular filtration rate, antihypertensive therapy, diabetes mellitus, and smoking; blood biomarkers; and subclinical disease measures, including ankle-brachial index, carotid intimal-medial thickness, and echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and systolic dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incident CVD event was defined as the first occurrence of myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease death, congestive heart failure, stroke, incident angina, or intermittent claudication. Model performance was compared with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) CVD risk algorithm and the Framingham Risk Score (FHS) refitted to the JHS data and evaluated in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohorts.
resultsThe study cohort comprised 3689 participants with mean (SD) age at baseline was 53 (11) years, and 64.8% (n = 2390) were female. Over a median of 9.1 years, 270 participants (166 women) experienced a first CVD event. A simple combination of standard CVD risk factors, B-type natriuretic peptide, and ankle-brachial index (model 6) yielded modest improvement over a model without B-type natriuretic peptide and ankle-brachial index (C statistic, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75-0.83 [relative integrated discrimination improvement, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.30]). However, the reclassification improvement was not substantially different between model 6 and the ACC/AHA CVD Pooled Cohort risk equations or between model 6 and the FHS. The models discriminated reasonably well in the ARIC and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis data (C statistic range, 0.70-0.77). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings using the JHS data in the present study are valuable because they confirm that current FHS and ACC/AHA risk algorithms work well in black individuals and are not easily improved on. A unique risk calculator for black adults may not be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.