Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27437370›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016

Evaluation of Patient Perceptions After Vestibuloplasty Procedure: A Comparison of Diode Laser and Scalpel Techniques.

Butchibabu Kalakonda, Sana Farista, Pradeep Koppolu, Kusai Baroudi, Udaykiran Uppada, Ashank Mishra, Abhishek Savarimath, Amara Swapna Lingam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Butchibabu KalakondaFaculty, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, AlFarabi Colleges , Riyadh, KSA .
Sana FaristaFaculty, Department of Periodontics, Maitri Dental College , Chhattisgarh, India .
Pradeep KoppoluFaculty, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, AlFarabi Colleges , Riyadh, KSA .
Kusai BaroudiFaculty, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, AlFarabi Colleges , Riyadh, KSA .
Udaykiran UppadaFaculty, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery , Vikarabad, Telangana, India .
Ashank MishraFaculty, Department of Periodontics, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery , Vikarabad, Telangana, India .
Abhishek SavarimathFaculty, Department of Prosthodontics, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery , Vikarabad, Telangana, India .
Amara Swapna LingamFaculty, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, AlFarabi Colleges , Riyadh, KSA .
Alfaisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInadequate vestibular depth results in poor plaque control owing to an insufficient width of keratinized gingiva. Vestibuloplasty provides the necessary vestibular depth and can be performed either with a scalpel, electrocautery or lasers.

aimTo evaluate the patient perceptions related to pain and discomfort on the 1(st), 3(rd) and the 7(th) day post vestibuloplasty and also assess the healing outcomes related to the treatment of inadequate vestibular depth either with the diode laser or the scalpel. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty patients who had inadequate vestibular depth and required vestibuloplasty were assigned randomly to undergo the procedure either with the scalpel or the laser. The data obtained was analysed for intergroup comparison with an independent paired t-test and intragroup comparison was determined by a paired t-test.

resultsIntragroup comparison within the laser group for VAS scores of pain and discomfort within all the reported days exhibited a significant difference (p<0.05). Inter group comparison revealed that the patients in the laser group had lower VAS cores for pain and discomfort compared to the scalpel group (p<0.05). Analysis of the three pointer scale for healing revealed that the patients in the laser group exhibited better healing outcomes on the 1(st), 3(rd) and the 7(th) day compared to the scalpel group.

conclusionObservations from the study highlight the opinion that laser can be a safe and effective alternative to traditional vestibuloplasty performed with the scalpel.

Indexed as

Clark’s vestibuloplastyLow level laser therapy (LLLT)Vestibular depthVisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID27437370
PMCPMC4948546
OpenAlexW2411522456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.