Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27437354›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016

Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of QMiX, 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine, Guava Leaf Extract and Aloevera Extract Against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans - An in-vitro Study.

Jerin Jose, Shoba Krishnamma, Faizal Peedikayil, Shibu Aman, Nithya Tomy, Jithin Pulickal Mariodan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dental research journal · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Antimicrobial efficacy of QMix onRestorative dentistry & endodontics · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. [Research progress on QMix properties in root canal irrigation].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jerin JoseJunior Resident, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College , Kottayam, Kerala, India .
Shoba KrishnammaProfessor and Head of Department, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College , Kottayam, Kerala, India .
Faizal PeedikayilProfessor, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kannur Dental College , Kannur, India .
Shibu AmanAssistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College , Kottayam, Kerala, India .
Nithya TomyJunior Resident, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kannur Dental College , Kannur, India .
Jithin Pulickal MariodanJunior Resident, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Koorg Institute of Dental Sciences , Virajpettu, India .
Government Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDebridement and disinfection of the root canal system is a critical step in endodontic treatment. Most of the irrigants presently used in the endodontic treatment can have an impact on the microbes surviving in the biofilm but none of them are able to do all of the required tasks. Researches are going on its full swing in order to produce an endodontic irrigant having ideal properties.

aimTo compare the antimicrobial efficacy of different irrigants like QMiX, guava leaf extract, aloevera extract, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe antimicrobial activity was determined using agar diffusion test. The solutions were divided into five groups: Group I- QMiX, Group II- Guava leaf extract and Group III-Aloevera extract, Group IV-2.5% Sodium hypochlorite and Group V-2% Chlorhexidine. The zones of inhibition of growth were recorded.

resultsStatistical analysis was performed using one way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's HSD. Values obtained were statistically analyzed (p<0.05). QMiX showed maximum inhibitory effect against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans followed by, 2% chlorhexidine, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, guava leaf extract and aloevera extract. Results obtained were statistically significant.

conclusionGuava leaf extract showed significant inhibitory effects against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. QMiX demonstrated the best results among the tested solutions and can be considered as a potential alternative to existing root canal irrigants.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial efficacyMicrobial infectionRoot canal irrigation

Identifiers

PMID27437354
PMCPMC4948530
OpenAlexW2518574663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.