ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2016
Probiotic isolates from unconventional sources: a review.
Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed, 202 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations among probiotic/prebiotic consumption, depression and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Management of Probiotics and Prebiotic Products to Modulate Gut Microbiome by Healthcare Services.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- In vitro assessment of antioxidant, hypocholesterolemic and alpha-amylase inhibition of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains from a fermented Algerian milk.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Lacticaseibacillus Casei KGC1201 Isolated from Panax Ginseng Mitigates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis by Modulating the Gut Environment.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Probiotic Apilactobacillus Kunkeei EABW06 from Beeswax Microbiota: A Candidate for Functional Dairy Foods.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Natural and Biological Products Therapeutic Potential in Restoring Gut Microbiome: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Implications.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Probiotics: multifunctional microorganisms for human health and biotechnological applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- In-vitro evaluation of probiotic potential of gut microbes isolated from retail chicken.PloS one · 2026Article
- Genomic and phenotypic analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Probiotic Potential and Genome-Based Characterization ofPharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Article
- Probiotic Potential of Traditional and Emerging Microbial Strains in Functional Foods: From Characterization to Applications and Health Benefits.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Dynamic Interactions between the Gut Microbiome, Health, and Metabolic Disorders in Preterm Infants.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Characterization and Evaluation ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- A Bifidobacterium Strain with Antibacterial Activity, Its Antibacterial Characteristics and In Vitro Probiotics Studies.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Characteristics and in vitro properties of potential probiotic strain Fructobacillus tropaeoli KKP 3032 isolated from orange juice.Folia microbiologica · 2025Article
- Review
- Integrative Analysis of Probiotic-Mediated Remodeling in Canine Gut Microbiota and Metabolites Using a Fermenter for an Intestinal Microbiota Model.Food science of animal resources · 2024Article
- Isolation, identification, and potentiality of gut-derived probiotic bacteria fromJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024Article
- Article
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of probiotics for human and animal health is continuously increasing. The probiotics used in humans commonly come from dairy foods, whereas the sources of probiotics used in animals are often the animals' own digestive tracts. Increasingly, probiotics from sources other than milk products are being selected for use in people who are lactose intolerant. These sources are non-dairy fermented foods and beverages, non-dairy and non-fermented foods such as fresh fruits and vegetables, feces of breast-fed infants and human breast milk. The probiotics that are used in both humans and animals are selected in stages; after the initial isolation of the appropriate culture medium, the probiotics must meet important qualifications, including being non-pathogenic acid and bile-tolerant strains that possess the ability to act against pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract and the safety-enhancing property of not being able to transfer any antibiotic resistance genes to other bacteria. The final stages of selection involve the accurate identification of the probiotic species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.