Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27437053›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2016

Patient Experiences Using an Inpatient Personal Health Record.

Janet Woollen, Jennifer Prey, Lauren Wilcox, Alexander Sackeim, Susan Restaino, Syed T Raza, Suzanne Bakken, Steven Feiner, George Hripcsak, David Vawdrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. A randomized controlled trial to improve engagement of hospitalized patients with their patient portals.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Physicians' Perspectives on Inpatient Portals: Systematic Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Janet WoollenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University , New York, NY.
Jennifer PreyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University , New York, NY.
Lauren WilcoxSchool of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, GA.
Alexander SackeimUniversity of Pennsylvania Health System , Pennsylvania, PA.
Susan RestainoCollege of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center , New York, NY.
Syed T RazaCollege of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center , New York, NY.
Suzanne BakkenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY; School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Steven FeinerDepartment of Computer Science, Columbia University , New York, NY.
George HripcsakDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University , New York, NY.
David VawdreyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.

Funding

Reducing Health Disparities Through Informatics - Genomics SupplementT32NR007969 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE BAKKEN, Rebecca Schnall · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
Addressing Hospital Patient Information Needs Using a PHR PortalR01HS021816 · AHRQ · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI VAWDREY, DAVID K. · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS021816NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate patients' experience using an inpatient personal health record (PHR) on a tablet computer to increase engagement in their hospital care.

methodsWe performed observations and conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 post-operative cardiac surgical patients and their family members who received an inpatient PHR. Themes were identified using an inductive coding scheme.

resultsAll participants responded favorably to having access to view their clinical information. A majority (85.7%) of participants used the application following an initial training session. Patients reported high satisfaction with being able to view their hospital medications and access educational materials related to their medical conditions. Patients reported a desire to view daily progress reports about their hospital stay and have access to educational information about their post-acute recovery. In addition, patients expressed a common desire to view their diagnoses, laboratory test results, radiology reports, and procedure notes in language that is patient-friendly.

conclusionPatients have unmet information needs in the hospital setting. Our findings suggest that for some inpatients and their family members, providing personalized health information through a tablet computer may improve satisfaction, decrease anxiety, increase understanding of their health conditions, and improve safety and quality of care.

Indexed as

Health Records, PersonalInpatientsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactioninpatientPatient engagementpersonal health recordstechnology

Identifiers

PMID27437053
PMCPMC4941852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.