Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27437047›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2016

Using Electronic Case Summaries to Elicit Multi-Disciplinary Expert Knowledge about Referrals to Post-Acute Care.

Kathryn H Bowles, Sarah Ratcliffe, Sheryl Potashnik, Maxim Topaz, John Holmes, Nai-Wei Shih, Mary D Naylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Using a Decision Support Algorithm for Referrals to Post-Acute Care.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathryn H BowlesUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA; Visiting Nurse Service of New York.
Sarah RatcliffeUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, PA.
Sheryl PotashnikUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing , Philadelphia, PA.
Maxim TopazUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing , Philadelphia, PA.
John HolmesUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, PA.
Nai-Wei ShihUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing , Philadelphia, PA.
Mary D NaylorUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing , Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

Factors to Support Effective Discharge Decision MakingR01NR007674 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BOWLES, KATHRYN HELENE · 2001 to 2015
$3.6M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR007674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEliciting knowledge from geographically dispersed experts given their time and scheduling constraints, while maintaining anonymity among them, presents multiple challenges.

objectivesDescribe an innovative, Internet based method to acquire knowledge from experts regarding patients who need post-acute referrals. Compare, 1) the percentage of patients referred by experts to percentage of patients actually referred by hospital clinicians, 2) experts' referral decisions by disciplines and geographic regions, and 3) most common factors deemed important by discipline.

methodsDe-identified case studies, developed from electronic health records (EHR), contained a comprehensive description of 1,496 acute care inpatients. In teams of three, physicians, nurses, social workers, and physical therapists reviewed case studies and assessed the need for post-acute care referrals; Delphi rounds followed when team members did not agree. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) compared experts' decisions by discipline, region of the country and to the decisions made by study hospital clinicians, adjusting for the repeated observations from each expert and case. Frequencies determined the most common case characteristics chosen as important by the experts.

resultsThe experts recommended referral for 80% of the cases; the actual discharge disposition of the patients showed referrals for 67%. Experts from the Northeast and Midwest referred 5% more cases than experts from the West. Physicians and nurses referred patients at similar rates while both referred more often than social workers. Differences by discipline were seen in the factors identified as important to the decision.

conclusionThe method for eliciting expert knowledge enabled national dispersed expert clinicians to anonymously review case summaries and make decisions about post-acute care referrals. Having time and a comprehensive case summary may have assisted experts to identify more patients in need of post-acute care than the hospital clinicians. The methodology produced the data needed to develop an expert decision support system for discharge planning.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient Care TeamReferral and ConsultationHumansInternetSubacute Caredecision supportDelphi roundsdischarge planningKnowledge elicitationnursing informatics

Identifiers

PMID27437047
PMCPMC4941846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.