ArticleBreeding science2016
Quantitative trait locus mapping of soybean maturity gene E5.
Article in Breeding science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting genetic architecture of flowering and maturity traits in soybean using GWAS in Indian environment.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Global identification and characterization of soybean TPR genes with expression analysis under photoperiod variations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial selection of two antagonistic E3 ubiquitin ligases finetunes soybean photoperiod adaptation and grain yield.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Genome-wide association study reveals GmFulb as candidate gene for maturity time and reproductive length in soybeans (Glycine max).PloS one · 2024Article
- Marker-Assisted Selection for Early MaturingBiomolecules · 2023Article
- A genome-wide analysis of the USDA Soybean Isoline Collection.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Novel and multifaceted regulations of photoperiodic flowering by phytochrome A in soybean.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Transcriptome Analysis of Short-Day Photoperiod Inducement in Adzuki Bean (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Genetic control and allele variation among soybean maturity groups 000 through IX.The plant genome · 2021Article
- A flowering time locus dependent onMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2021Article
- The Modification of Circadian Clock Components in Soybean During Domestication and Improvement.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Integration of lodging resistance QTL in soybean.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Transcriptome-Enabled Network Inference Revealed theFrontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Genotyping of Soybean Cultivars With Medium-Density Array Reveals the Population Structure and QTNs Underlying Maturity and Seed Traits.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Allelic Variation and Distribution of the Major Maturity Genes in Different Soybean Collections.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping of Flowering Time and Maturity in Soybean Using Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Analysis.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time to flowering and maturity in soybean is controlled by loci E1 to E5, and E7 to E9. These loci were assigned to molecular linkage groups (MLGs) except for E5. This study was conducted to map the E5 locus using F2 populations expected to segregate for E5. F2 populations were subjected to quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis for days to flowering (DF) and maturity (DM). In Harosoy-E5 × Clark-e2 population, QTLs for DF and DM were found at a similar position with E2. In Harosoy × Clark-e2E5 population, QTLs for DF and DM were found in MLG D1a and B1, respectively. In Harosoy-E5Dt2 × Clark-e2 population, a QTL for DF was found in MLG B1. Thus, results from these populations were not fully consistent, and no candidate QTL for E5 was found. In Harosoy × PI 80837 population, from which E5 was originally identified, QTLs corresponding to E1 and E3 were found, but none for E5 existed. Harosoy and PI 80837 had the e2-ns allele whereas Harosoy-E5 had the E2-dl allele. The E2-dl allele of Harosoy-E5 may have been generated by outcrossing and may be responsible for the lateness of Harosoy-E5. We conclude that a unique E5 gene may not exist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.