Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27436850›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2016

Impact of thoracic radiotherapy timing in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: usefulness of the individual patient data meta-analysis.

D De Ruysscher, B Lueza, C Le Péchoux, D H Johnson, M O'Brien, N Murray, S Spiro, X Wang, M Takada, B Lebeau and 9 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-upAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Five-Decade Journey of Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. SEOM-GECP Clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (2022).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  16. Progress in radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer.Precision radiation oncology · 2023
    Review
  17. Survey of treatment and care practices in small-cell lung cancer among German radiation oncologists.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  18. Coronavirus disease 2019 and lung cancer: where are we?Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

D De RuysscherDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
B LuezaDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and "Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer" meta-analysis platform, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France CESP, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif.
C Le PéchouxDepartment of Oncology and radiation therapy, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
D H JohnsonUT Southwestern University School of Medicine, Dallas, USA.
M O'BrienEORTC Data Center, Brussels, Belgium.
N MurrayBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
S SpiroUniversity College London Hospitals, London, UK.
X WangAlliance Data and Statistical Center, Duke University, Durham, USA.
M TakadaOsaka Prefectural Habikino Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
B LebeauHôpital St Antoine, Paris, France.
W BlackstockWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
D SkarlosSecond Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital N. Faliro, Athens, Greece.
P BaasThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H ChoyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
A PriceNHS Lothian and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
L SeymourNCIC Clinical Trials Group and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
R ArriagadaGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J-P PignonDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and "Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer" meta-analysis platform, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France CESP, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif jean-pierre.pignon@gustaveroussy.fr.
RTT-SCLC Collaborative Group

Funding

Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
UT Southwestern NCI National Clinical Trials Network Lead Academic Site - U10U10CA180870 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GERBER, DAVID ERIC · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemotherapy (CT) combined with radiotherapy is the standard treatment of 'limited-stage' small-cell lung cancer. However, controversy persists over the optimal timing of thoracic radiotherapy and CT. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe carried out a meta-analysis of individual patient data in randomized trials comparing earlier versus later radiotherapy, or shorter versus longer radiotherapy duration, as defined in each trial. We combined the results from trials using the stratified log-rank test to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs). The primary outcome was overall survival.

resultsTwelve trials with 2668 patients were eligible. Data from nine trials comprising 2305 patients were available for analysis. The median follow-up was 10 years. When all trials were analysed together, 'earlier or shorter' versus 'later or longer' thoracic radiotherapy did not affect overall survival. However, the HR for overall survival was significantly in favour of 'earlier or shorter' radiotherapy among trials with a similar proportion of patients who were compliant with CT (defined as having received 100% or more of the planned CT cycles) in both arms (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91), and in favour of 'later or longer' radiotherapy among trials with different rates of CT compliance (HR 1.19, 1.05-1.34, interaction test, P < 0.0001). The absolute gain between 'earlier or shorter' versus 'later or longer' thoracic radiotherapy in 5-year overall survival for similar and for different CT compliance trials was 7.7% (95% CI 2.6-12.8%) and -2.2% (-5.8% to 1.4%), respectively. However, 'earlier or shorter' thoracic radiotherapy was associated with a higher incidence of severe acute oesophagitis than 'later or longer' radiotherapy.

conclusion'Earlier or shorter' delivery of thoracic radiotherapy with planned CT significantly improves 5-year overall survival at the expense of more acute toxicity, especially oesophagitis.

Indexed as

Drug TherapyCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaCisplatinchemotherapy complianceindividual participant data meta-analysisradiotherapy timingrandomized clinical trialssmall-cell lung cancerthoracic radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27436850
PMCPMC5035783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.