ArticleBMJ open2016
Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Communicating evidence about the environment's role in obesity and support for government policies to tackle obesity: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Health psychology review · 2022Pooled it
- The 2016 HIGh Heels: Health effects And psychosexual BenefITS (HIGH HABITS) study: systematic review of reviews and additional primary studies.BMC public health · 2017Pooled it
- Mapping how responsibility for poor diets is framed in the United Kingdom: a scoping review.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- The dilemma of sweet temptation: How sugar perception confusion in sweetened beverages shapes consumer avoidance behavior.PloS one · 2025Article
- Declining trends in sweetness of the diet in the United Kingdom: 2008/9-2018/19.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- What works in advocating for food advertising policy change across an english region - a realist evaluation.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Health taxes in Indonesia: a review of policy debates on the tobacco, alcoholic beverages and sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in the media.BMJ global health · 2023Review
- Framing a New Nutrition Policy: Changes on Key Stakeholder's Discourses throughout the Implementation of the Chilean Food Labelling Law.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Reactions of industry and associated organisations to the announcement of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: longitudinal thematic analysis of UK media articles, 2016-18.BMC public health · 2023Article
- A discourse and content analysis of representation in the mainstream media of the South African National Health Insurance policy from 2011 to 2019.BMC public health · 2023Review
- Electoral campaign contributions: an obstacle to sugary drink industry regulation in Brazil?Public health nutrition · 2022Article
- Public perception of the tax on sweetened beverages in France.Public health nutrition · 2022Article
- Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods.Health research policy and systems · 2022Review
- Media coverage of Belgium's first criminal case concerning euthanasia for psychiatric patients: A content analysis of Flemish newspapers and magazines.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Sugary drinks taxation: industry's lobbying strategies, practices and arguments in the Brazilian Legislature.Public health nutrition · 2022Article
- Exploring the Role of Self-Kindness in Making Healthier Eating Choices: A Preliminary Study.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- How does the British Soft Drink Association respond to media research reporting on the health consequences of sugary drinks?Globalization and health · 2021Article
- The sugar content of foods in the UK by category and company: A repeated cross-sectional study, 2015-2018.PLoS medicine · 2021Article
- Examining the news media reaction to a national sugary beverage tax in South Africa: a quantitative content analysis.BMC public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the extent of media-based public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging regarding sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs).
designWe conducted a systematic analysis to identify and examine all articles regarding SSBs published in all mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014. We initially conducted a brief literature search to develop appropriate search terms and categorisations for grouping and analysing the articles. Articles were then coded according to the publishing newspaper, article type, topic, prominence and slant (pro-SSB or anti-SSB). A contextual analysis was undertaken to examine key messages in the articles.
resultsWe identified 374 articles published during 2014. The majority of articles (81%) suggested that SSBs are unhealthy. Messaging from experts, campaign groups and health organisations was fairly consistent about the detrimental effects of SSB on health. However, relatively few articles assessed any approaches or solutions to potentially combat the problems associated with SSBs. Only one-quarter (24%) suggested any policy change. Meanwhile, articles concerning the food industry produced consistent messages emphasising consumer choice and individual responsibility for making choices regarding SSB consumption, and promoting and advertising their products. The food industry thus often managed to avoid association with the negative press that their products were receiving.
conclusionsSSBs were frequently published in mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites during 2014. Public health media advocacy was prominent throughout, with a growing consensus that sugary drinks are bad for people's health. However, the challenge for public health will be to mobilise supportive public opinion to help implement effective regulatory policies. Only then will our population's excess consumption of SSBs come under control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.