Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27436523›Full record

ArticleHeredity2016

Demographic history, current expansion and future management challenges of wild boar populations in the Balkans and Europe.

N Veličković, E Ferreira, M Djan, M Ernst, D Obreht Vidaković, A Monaco, C Fonseca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Population structure and history ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N VeličkovićDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
E FerreiraDepartment of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0497-6118
M DjanDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
M ErnstDepartment of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
D Obreht VidakovićDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
A MonacoRegional Parks Agency-Lazio Region, Rome, Italy.
C FonsecaDepartment of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild boar (Sus scrofa), one of the most widespread wildlife species, has entered a stage of continuous growth in Europe, and could even be considered a pest species. We analysed microsatellite variability in 723 wild boars from across Europe, including the northern Dinaric Balkans. Our aims were: (1) to define the population structure of wild boars in the Balkans and its relation with other European populations; (2) to estimate effective populations sizes, levels of intra- and inter-population diversity, inbreeding migration and gene flow patterns; (3) to test subpopulations for bottlenecks; (4) to interpret these results in light of current knowledge about the demographic history of wild boars in Europe; and (5) to discuss the relevance of these findings for management and conservation. Strong population structuring was observed and 14 subpopulations were revealed. High genetic diversity was found, and besides the well-known identity of the Italian populations of Sardinia and Castelporziano, we bring new insights into other potential relevant, refugial populations such as Littoral Slovenia, South Portugal, North-western Iberia and an entire cluster in the Balkans. There was evidence of gene flow going from these refugial subpopulations towards less peripheral and more admixed subpopulations. Recent population bottlenecks and expansions were detected, mostly in the peninsular refuge subpopulations. The results are consistent with the fluctuations of wild boar numbers in Europe since the beginning of the twentieth century. These results should be taken into account in future conservation and management plans for wild boar populations in Europe.

Indexed as

Gene FlowGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationAnimalsBalkan PeninsulaConservation of Natural ResourcesEuropeGene FrequencyGenotyping TechniquesInbreedingMicrosatellite RepeatsModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID27436523
PMCPMC5061920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.