Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27436381›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2016

Application of gas diffusion biocathode in microbial electrosynthesis from carbon dioxide.

Suman Bajracharya, Karolien Vanbroekhoven, Cees J N Buisman, Deepak Pant, David P B T B Strik

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Copper foam supported g-CScientific reports · 2023
    Article
  5. Microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from COEnvironmental science and ecotechnology · 2023
    Article
  6. Microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from COEnvironmental science and ecotechnology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enrichment ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Technoeconomic perspectives on sustainable COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suman BajracharyaSeparation and Conversion Technologies, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Karolien VanbroekhovenSeparation and Conversion Technologies, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Cees J N BuismanSub-department of Environmental Technology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Deepak PantSeparation and Conversion Technologies, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium. deepak.pant@vito.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1425-9588
David P B T B StrikSub-department of Environmental Technology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Flemish Institute for Technological Research · BEWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial catalysis of carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

AcetatesAnaerobiosisBacteriaBioelectric Energy SourcesBioreactorsCarbonCarbon DioxideCatalysisConservation of Natural ResourcesElectrodesEnvironmental PollutantsHydrogenSewageAcetatesCarbonCarbon DioxideEnvironmental PollutantsHydrogenSewageAutotrophic bioproductionBiocathodeCO2 reductionGas diffusion electrodeMicrobial electrosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID27436381
OpenAlexW2504324019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.