ReviewDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2016
Toward high-resolution population genomics using archaeological samples.
Review in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Advancements and Challenges in Ancient DNA Research: Bridging the Global North-South Divide.Genes · 2023Review
- Temporal population structure, a genetic dating method for ancient Eurasian genomes from the past 10,000 years.Cell reports methods · 2022Article
- aYChr-DB: a database of ancient human Y haplogroups.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Ancient Ancestry Informative Markers for Identifying Fine-Scale Ancient Population Structure in Eurasians.Genes · 2018Article
- ARIADNA: machine learning method for ancient DNA variant discovery.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2018Article
- Complex spatio-temporal distribution and genomic ancestry of mitochondrial DNA haplogroups in 24,216 Danes.PloS one · 2018Article
- Between Lake Baikal and the Baltic Sea: genomic history of the gateway to Europe.BMC genetics · 2017Article
- Evolutionary adaptation revealed by comparative genome analysis of woolly mammoths and elephants.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017Article
- Editorial: Population Genetics of Worldwide Jewish People.Frontiers in genetics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The term 'ancient DNA' (aDNA) is coming of age, with over 1,200 hits in the PubMed database, beginning in the early 1980s with the studies of 'molecular paleontology'. Rooted in cloning and limited sequencing of DNA from ancient remains during the pre-PCR era, the field has made incredible progress since the introduction of PCR and next-generation sequencing. Over the last decade, aDNA analysis ushered in a new era in genomics and became the method of choice for reconstructing the history of organisms, their biogeography, and migration routes, with applications in evolutionary biology, population genetics, archaeogenetics, paleo-epidemiology, and many other areas. This change was brought by development of new strategies for coping with the challenges in studying aDNA due to damage and fragmentation, scarce samples, significant historical gaps, and limited applicability of population genetics methods. In this review, we describe the state-of-the-art achievements in aDNA studies, with particular focus on human evolution and demographic history. We present the current experimental and theoretical procedures for handling and analysing highly degraded aDNA. We also review the challenges in the rapidly growing field of ancient epigenomics. Advancement of aDNA tools and methods signifies a new era in population genetics and evolutionary medicine research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.