Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27436018›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2017

Can pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging predict recurrence-free survival after whole-gland high-intensity focused ablation for prostate cancer?

Rémy Rosset, Flavie Bratan, Sébastien Crouzet, Hélène Tonoli-Catez, Florence Mège-Lechevallier, Albert Gelet, Olivier Rouvière

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation on endometriosis of the abdominal wall.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rémy RossetHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Radiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, F-69437, France.
Flavie BratanHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Radiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, F-69437, France.
Sébastien CrouzetHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, F-69437, France.
Hélène Tonoli-CatezHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, F-69437, France.
Florence Mège-LechevallierHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Pathology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, F-69437, France.
Albert GeletHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, F-69437, France.
Olivier RouvièreHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Radiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, F-69437, France. olivier.rouviere@netcourrier.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0030-478X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur aim was to assess whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) after prostate cancer high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation.

methodsWe retrospectively selected 81 patients who underwent (i) whole-gland HIFU ablation between 2007 and 2011 as first-line therapy or salvage treatment after radiotherapy or brachytherapy, and (ii) pre- and postoperative MRI. On preoperative imaging, two senior (R1, R2) and one junior (R3) readers assessed the number of sectors invaded by the lesion with the highest Likert score (dominant lesion) using a 27-sector diagram. On postoperative imaging, readers assessed destruction of the dominant lesion using a three-level score. Multivariate analysis included the number of sectors invaded by the dominant lesion, its Likert and destruction scores, the pre-HIFU prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, and the clinical setting (primary/salvage).

resultsThe most significant predictor was the number of prostate sectors invaded by the dominant lesion for R2 and R3 (p≤0.001) and the destruction score of the dominant lesion for R1 (p = 0.011). The pre-HIFU PSA level was an independent predictor for R2 (p = 0.014), but with only marginal significance for R1 (p = 0.059) and R3 (p = 0.053).

conclusionThe dominant lesion's size and destruction assessed by MRI provide independent prognostic information compared with usual predictors. KEY POINTS: • The size of the MR-dominant lesion significantly influences post-HIFU recurrence-free survival. • The destruction score of the MR-dominant lesion predicts post-HIFU recurrence-free survival. • Patients with a completely devascularized MR-dominant lesion show better recurrence-free survival • Pre- and post-HIFU MRI provide prognostic information independent of usual predictors.

Indexed as

AgedHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative PeriodPrognosisProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapyTreatment OutcomeProstate-Specific AntigenHigh-intensity focused ultrasoundIndex tumourMRIProstate cancerRecurrence-free survival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.