Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27435932›Full record

ArticleGenome research2016

Postmortem genetic screening for the identification, verification, and reporting of genetic variants contributing to the sudden death of the young.

D Nicole R Methner, Steven E Scherer, Katherine Welch, Magdalena Walkiewicz, Christine M Eng, John W Belmont, Mark C Powell, Viktoriya Korchina, Harsha Vardhan Doddapaneni, Donna M Muzny and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D Nicole R MethnerHarris County Institute of Forensic Sciences, Houston, Texas 77054, USA;
Steven E SchererHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA;
Katherine WelchHarris County Institute of Forensic Sciences, Houston, Texas 77054, USA;
Magdalena WalkiewiczDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA;
Christine M EngDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA;
John W BelmontDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Mark C PowellHarris County Institute of Forensic Sciences, Houston, Texas 77054, USA;
Viktoriya KorchinaHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA;
Harsha Vardhan DoddapaneniHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA;
Donna M MuznyHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA;
Richard A GibbsHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA;
Dwayne A WolfHarris County Institute of Forensic Sciences, Houston, Texas 77054, USA;
Luis A SanchezHarris County Institute of Forensic Sciences, Houston, Texas 77054, USA;
Roger KahnHarris County Institute of Forensic Sciences, Houston, Texas 77054, USA;
Baylor College of Medicine · USInstitute of Forensic Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each year in the United States, thousands of cases of sudden and unexpected deaths of infants, children, and young adults are assigned an undetermined cause of death after postmortem investigation and autopsy. Heritable genetic variants have been suggested as the cause of up to a third of sudden death (SD) cases. Elucidation of the genetic variants involved in SD cases is important to not only help establish cause and manner of death of these individuals, but to also aid in determining whether familial genetic testing should be considered. Previously, these types of postmortem screenings have not been a feasible option for most county medical examiners' and coroners' offices. We sequenced full exons of 64 genes associated with SD in the largest known cohort (351) of infant and young SD decedents using massively parallel sequencing at <$600 per sample. Genetic variants were assessed through literature review and clinical evaluation by a multidisciplinary consortium of experts. Thirteen individuals (3.7%), eight infants (2.8% of those <1 yr of age) and five children/young adults (7.0% of those >1 yr of age), were found to have a reportable genetic variant contributing to SD. These percentages represent an estimate lower than those previously reported. Overall yields and results likely vary between studies due to differences in evaluation techniques and reporting. Additionally, we recommend ongoing assessment of data, including nonreported novel variants, as technology and literature continually advance. This study demonstrates a strategy to implement molecular autopsies in medicolegal investigations of young SD decedents.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingGenetic VariationAdolescentAdultAutopsyCardiomyopathiesChildChild, PreschoolDeath, SuddenDiagnosisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27435932
PMCPMC5052040
OpenAlexW2479226833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.