Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27435818›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2016

Understanding the theoretical underpinning of the exercise component in a fall prevention programme for older adults with mild dementia: a realist review protocol.

Vicky Booth, Rowan Harwood, Victoria Hood, Tahir Masud, Philippa Logan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vicky BoothDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom. mcxvb2@nottingham.ac.uk.
Rowan HarwoodGeriatric Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
Victoria HoodSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, United Kingdom.
Tahir MasudGeriatric Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
Philippa LoganDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-DG-0611-10013Department of Health RP-PG-0614-20007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults with mild dementia are at an increased risk of falls. Preventing those at risk from falling requires complex interventions involving patient-tailored strength- and balance-challenging exercises, home hazard assessment, visual impairment correction, medical assessment and multifactorial combinations. Evidence for these interventions in older adults with mild cognitive problems is sparse and not as conclusive as the evidence for the general community-dwelling older population. The objectives of this realist review are (i) to identify the underlying programme theory of strength and balance exercise interventions targeted at those individuals that have been identified as falling and who have a mild dementia and (ii) to explore how and why that intervention reduces falls in that population, particularly in the context of a community setting. This protocol will explain the rationale for using a realist review approach and outline the method.

methodsA realist review is a methodology that extends the scope of a traditional narrative or systematic evidence review. Increasingly used in the evaluation of complex interventions, a realist enquiry can look at the wider context of the intervention, seeking more to explain than judge if the intervention is effective by investigating why, what the underlying mechanism is and the necessary conditions for success. In this review, key rough programme theories were articulated and defined through discussion with a stakeholder group. The six rough programme theories outlined within this protocol will be tested against the literature found using the described comprehensive search strategy. The process of data extraction, appraisal and synthesis is outlined and will lead to the production of an explanatory programme theory. DISCUSSION: As far as the authors are aware, this is the first realist literature review within fall prevention research and adds to the growing use of this methodology within healthcare. This synthesis of evidence will provide a valuable addition to the evidence base surrounding the exercise component of a fall intervention programme for older adults with mild dementia and will ultimately provide clinically relevant recommendations for improving the care of people with dementia. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015030169.

Indexed as

Research DesignAccidental FallsAgingDementiaExercise TherapyHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicAccidental fallsCognitive impairmentDementiaExerciseFall preventionRealist reviewRealist synthesis

Identifiers

PMID27435818
PMCPMC4952275
OpenAlexW2490662564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.