Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27435796›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

The Evolution of Olfactory Gene Families in Drosophila and the Genomic Basis of chemical-Ecological Adaptation in Drosophila suzukii.

Sukanya Ramasamy, Lino Ometto, Cristina M Crava, Santosh Revadi, Rupinder Kaur, David S Horner, Davide Pisani, Teun Dekker, Gianfranco Anfora, Omar Rota-Stabelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Receptor sequence divergence, gain, loss, duplication, and neofunctionalization drive olfactory adaptation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Genomic plasticity drives olfactory adaptation in a pest fly.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sukanya RamasamyAgricultural Entomology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy Diparimento di Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Lino OmettoAgricultural Entomology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Cristina M CravaAgricultural Entomology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Santosh RevadiAgricultural Entomology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy Chemical Ecology Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Rupinder KaurAgricultural Entomology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
David S HornerDiparimento di Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Davide PisaniSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Teun DekkerChemical Ecology Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Gianfranco AnforaAgricultural Entomology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Omar Rota-StabelliAgricultural Entomology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy omar.rota@fmach.it.
Fondazione Edmund Mach · ITSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How the evolution of olfactory genes correlates with adaption to new ecological niches is still a debated topic. We explored this issue in Drosophila suzukii, an emerging model that reproduces on fresh fruit rather than in fermenting substrates like most other Drosophila We first annotated the repertoire of odorant receptors (ORs), odorant binding proteins (OBPs), and antennal ionotropic receptors (aIRs) in the genomes of two strains of D. suzukii and of its close relative Drosophila biarmipes We then analyzed these genes on the phylogeny of 14 Drosophila species: whereas ORs and OBPs are characterized by higher turnover rates in some lineages including D. suzukii, aIRs are conserved throughout the genus. Drosophila suzukii is further characterized by a non-random distribution of OR turnover on the gene phylogeny, consistent with a change in selective pressures. In D. suzukii, we found duplications and signs of positive selection in ORs with affinity for short-chain esters, and loss of function of ORs with affinity for volatiles produced during fermentation. These receptors-Or85a and Or22a-are characterized by divergent alleles in the European and American genomes, and we hypothesize that they may have been replaced by some of the duplicated ORs in corresponding neurons, a hypothesis reciprocally confirmed by electrophysiological recordings. Our study quantifies the evolution of olfactory genes in Drosophila and reveals an array of genomic events that can be associated with the ecological adaptations of D. suzukii.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalEvolution, MolecularAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGenome, InsectMultigene FamilyPhylogenyReceptors, OdorantSelection, GeneticDrosophila ProteinsOR22a protein, DrosophilaOr85a protein, DrosophilaReceptors, Odorantadaptationcomparative genomicsDrosophila suzukiiodorant receptors

Identifiers

PMID27435796
PMCPMC5010897
OpenAlexW2482375145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.