Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27435795›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Localized Retroprocessing as a Model of Intron Loss in the Plant Mitochondrial Genome.

Argelia Cuenca, T Gregory Ross, Sean W Graham, Craig F Barrett, Jerrold I Davis, Ole Seberg, Gitte Petersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Mitochondrial Genome ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Argelia CuencaNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
T Gregory RossDepartment of Botany, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada UBC Botanical Garden & Centre for Plant Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sean W GrahamDepartment of Botany, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada UBC Botanical Garden & Centre for Plant Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Craig F BarrettDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University, Los Angeles, California.
Jerrold I DavisL.H. Bailey Hortorium and Plant Biology Section, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Ole SebergNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gitte PetersenNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark gittep@snm.ku.dk.
Natural History Museum Aarhus · DKUniversity of British Columbia · CACalifornia State University Los Angeles · USCornell University · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of introns in plant mitochondrial genes is commonly explained by retroprocessing. Under this model, an mRNA is reverse transcribed and integrated back into the genome, simultaneously affecting the contents of introns and edited sites. To evaluate the extent to which retroprocessing explains intron loss, we analyzed patterns of intron content and predicted RNA editing for whole mitochondrial genomes of 30 species in the monocot order Alismatales. In this group, we found an unusually high degree of variation in the intron content, even expanding the hitherto known variation among angiosperms. Some species have lost some two-third of the cis-spliced introns. We found a strong correlation between intron content and editing frequency, and detected 27 events in which intron loss is consistent with the presence of nucleotides in an edited state, supporting retroprocessing. However, we also detected seven cases of intron loss not readily being explained by retroprocession. Our analyses are also not consistent with the entire length of a fully processed cDNA copy being integrated into the genome, but instead indicate that retroprocessing usually occurs for only part of the gene. In some cases, several rounds of retroprocessing may explain intron loss in genes completely devoid of introns. A number of taxa retroprocessing seem to be very common and a possibly ongoing process. It affects the entire mitochondrial genome.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialGenome, PlantIntronsRNA EditingAlismatalesEvolution, MolecularAlismatalesintron lossmitochondrial genomeretroprocessingRNA editing

Identifiers

PMID27435795
PMCPMC4987113
OpenAlexW2501485799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.