Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27435400›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2017

IL-21 Enhances Natural Killer Cell Response to Cetuximab-Coated Pancreatic Tumor Cells.

Elizabeth L McMichael, Alena Cristina Jaime-Ramirez, Kristan D Guenterberg, Eric Luedke, Lakhvir S Atwal, Amanda R Campbell, Zhiwei Hu, Armika S Tatum, Sri Vidya Kondadasula, Xiaokui Mo and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. From bench to bedside: the past, present and future of IL-21 immunotherapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024
    Review
  9. NK cell-based tumor immunotherapy.Bioactive materials · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Advances and Prospects in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth L McMichaelBiomedical Sciences Graduate Program, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Alena Cristina Jaime-RamirezDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Kristan D GuenterbergDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Eric LuedkeDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Lakhvir S AtwalComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Amanda R CampbellBiomedical Sciences Graduate Program, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Zhiwei HuComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Armika S TatumComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Sri Vidya KondadasulaComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Xiaokui MoCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Susheela TridandapaniDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Mark BloomstonDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
E Christopher EllisonDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Terence M WilliamsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Tanios Bekaii-SaabDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
William E CarsonDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. william.carson@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · USOhio State University Hospital · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
TWO SIGNAL REQUIREMENT FOR NATURAL KILLER IMMUNITYP01CA095426 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARSON, WILLIAM E. · 2002 to 2016
$29.6M
ONOCOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32CA009338 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BYRD, JOHN C., POLLOCK, RAPHAEL E. · 1985 to 2018
$8.3M
Integrative Training in Biomedical SystemsT32GM068412 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PARVIN, JEFFREY D · 2005 to 2020
$2.4M
A Program of Immune-Based Treatments for CancerK24CA093670 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARSON, WILLIAM E. · 2002 to 2012
$1.7M
Oncolytic virotherapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of brain tumorsF32CA186542 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JAIME-RAMIREZ, ALENA CRISTINA · 2015 to 2016
$113k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA186542NCI NIH HHS K24 CA093670NCI NIH HHS P01 CA095426NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009338NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM068412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlternative strategies to EGFR blockage by mAbs is necessary to improve the efficacy of therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. One such strategy includes the use of NK cells to clear cetuximab-coated tumor cells, as need for novel therapeutic approaches to enhance the efficacy of cetuximab is evident. We show that IL-21 enhances NK cell-mediated effector functions against cetuximab-coated pancreatic tumor cells irrespective of KRAS mutation status. EXPERIMENTAL

designNK cells from normal donors or donors with pancreatic cancer were used to assess ADCC, IFN-γ release, and T-cell chemotaxis toward human pancreatic cancer cell lines. The in vivo efficacy of IL-21 in combination with cetuximab was evaluated in a subcutaneous and intraperitoneal model of pancreatic cancer.

resultsNK cell lysis of cetuximab-coated wild-type and mutant kras pancreatic cancer cell lines were significantly higher following NK cell IL-21 treatment. In response to cetuximab-coated pancreatic tumor cells, IL-21-treated NK cells secreted significantly higher levels of IFN-γ and chemokines, increased chemotaxis of T cells, and enhanced NK cell signal transduction via activation of ERK and STAT1. Treatment of mice bearing subcutaneous or intraperitoneal EGFR-positive pancreatic tumor xenografts with mIL-21 and cetuximab led to significant inhibition of tumor growth, a result further enhanced by the addition of gemcitabine.

conclusionsThese results suggest that cetuximab treatment in combination with IL-21 adjuvant therapy in patients with EGFR-positive pancreatic cancer results in significant NK cell activation, irrespective of KRAS mutation status, and may be a potential therapeutic strategy. Clin Cancer Res; 23(2); 489-502. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibody-Dependent Cell CytotoxicityCell Line, TumorCetuximabChemotaxisFlow CytometryHumansInterferon-gammaInterleukin-21InterleukinsKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocyte ActivationMicePancreatic NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)T-LymphocytesCetuximabInterferon-gammaInterleukin-21InterleukinsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID27435400
PMCPMC5241232
OpenAlexW2490014226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.