Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27435367›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

Feasibility and acceptance of simultaneous amyloid PET/MRI.

Lisa Schütz, Donald Lobsien, Dominik Fritzsch, Solveig Tiepolt, Peter Werner, Matthias L Schroeter, Jörg Berrouschot, Dorothee Saur, Swen Hesse, Thies Jochimsen and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Imaging Techniques in Pharmacological Precision Medicine.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Transpathology: molecular imaging-based pathology.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Brain PET Poster Sessions PP01-M01 to PP02-N07.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Lisa SchützDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Donald LobsienDepartment of Neuroradiology, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Dominik FritzschDepartment of Neuroradiology, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Solveig TiepoltDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Peter WernerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Matthias L SchroeterDay Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, Leipzig University Hospital & Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Jörg BerrouschotClinical Centre Altenburger Land, 04600, Altenburg, Germany.
Dorothee SaurDepartment of Neurology, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Swen HesseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Thies JochimsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael RullmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Bernhard SattlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Marianne PattDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Hermann-Josef GertzDepartment of Psychiatry, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Arno VillringerDay Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, Leipzig University Hospital & Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Joseph ClaßenDepartment of Neurology, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Karl-Titus HoffmannDepartment of Neuroradiology, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Osama SabriDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Henryk BarthelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. barh@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEstablished Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker concepts classify into amyloid pathology and neuronal injury biomarkers, while recent alternative concepts classify into diagnostic and progression AD biomarkers. However, combined amyloid positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) offers the chance to obtain both biomarker category read-outs within one imaging session, with increased patient as well as referrer convenience. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate this matter for the first time.

methods100 subjects (age 70 ± 10 yrs, 46 female), n = 51 with clinically defined mild cognitive impairment (MCI), n = 44 with possible/probable AD dementia, and n = 5 with frontotemporal lobe degeneration, underwent simultaneous [

resultsIn three subjects, MRI revealed temporal lobe abnormalities other than MTLA. According to the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association classification, the combined amyloid-beta PET/MRI evaluation resulted in 31 %, 45 %, and 24 % of the MCI subjects being categorized as "MCI-unlikely due to AD", "MCI due to AD-intermediate likelihood", and "MCI due to AD-high likelihood", respectively. 50 % of the probable AD dementia patients were categorized as "High level of evidence of AD pathophysiological process", and 56 % of the possible AD dementia patients as "Possible AD dementia - with evidence of AD pathophysiological process". With regard to the International Working Group 2 classification, 36 subjects had both positive diagnostic and progression biomarkers. The patient/caregiver survey revealed a gain of convenience in 88 % of responders as compared to a theoretically separate PET and MR imaging. In the referrer survey, an influence of the combined amyloid-beta PET/MRI on the final diagnosis was reported by 82 % of responders, with a referrer acceptance score of 3.7 ± 1.0 on a 5-point scale.

conclusionSimultaneous amyloid PET/MRI is feasible and provides imaging biomarkers of all categories which are able to supplement the clinical diagnosis of MCI due to AD and that of AD dementia. Further, patient and referrer convenience is improved by this one-stop-shop imaging approach.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloidAttitude of Health PersonnelBiomarkersCognitive DysfunctionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMolecular ImagingMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyAmyloidBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseAmyloidMCIPET/MRI

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.