ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2016
Effect size for the main cognitive function determinants in a large cross-sectional study.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- CONSTANCES, the French nationwide population cohort: major accomplishments.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- A prospective investigation into the association between the gut microbiome composition and cognitive performance among healthy young adults.Gut pathogens · 2022Article
- Do Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Cardiovascular Disease Explain Sex Differences in Cognitive Functioning in Old Age?Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Article
- Article
- Is effort-reward imbalance at work associated with different domains of health functioning? Baseline results from the French CONSTANCES study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2019Article
- Long-term effects of compulsory schooling on physical, mental and cognitive ageing: a natural experiment.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2019Article
- Anticholinergic drug use and cognitive performances in middle age: findings from the CONSTANCES cohort.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2018Article
- Predicting dementia using socio-demographic characteristics and the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test in the general population.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2017Article
- CONSTANCES: a general prospective population-based cohort for occupational and environmental epidemiology: cohort profile.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe aim of our study was to examine the effect sizes of different cognitive function determinants in middle and early old age.
methodsCognitive functions were assessed in 11 711 volunteers (45 to 75 years old), included in the French CONSTANCES cohort between January 2012 and May 2014, using the free and cued selective reminding test (FCSRT), verbal fluency tasks, digit-symbol substitution test (DSST) and trail making test (TMT), parts A and B. The effect sizes of socio-demographic (age, sex, education), lifestyle (alcohol, tobacco, physical activity), cardiovascular (diabetes, blood pressure) and psychological (depressive symptomatology) variables were computed as omega-squared coefficients (ω
resultsThese sets of variables explained from R
conclusionSocio-demographic variables (age, gender and education) are the main variables associated with cognitive performance variations between 45 and 75 years of age in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.