ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2016
Dose enhancement effects to the nucleus and mitochondria from gold nanoparticles in the cytosol.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monte Carlo study of gold nanoparticle-mediated radiosensitization effects using nanoscale cell model combined with fractal-based DNA model.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Nanoscale gold nanoparticle (GNP)-laden tumor cell model and its use for estimation of intracellular dose from GNP-induced secondary electrons.Medical physics · 2024Article
- How Synthesis of Algal Nanoparticles Affects Cancer Therapy? - A Complete Review of the Literature.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Advancements in the use of Auger electrons in science and medicine during the period 2015-2019.International journal of radiation biology · 2023Review
- Biological Response of Human Cancer Cells to Ionizing Radiation in Combination with Gold Nanoparticles.Cancers · 2022Article
- Requirements for Designing an Effective Metallic Nanoparticle (NP)-Boosted Radiation Therapy (RT).Cancers · 2021Review
- Combined cell and nanoparticle models for TOPAS to study radiation dose enhancement in cell organelles.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Iodine nanoparticle radiotherapy of human breast cancer growing in the brains of athymic mice.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Radio-enhancement effects by radiolabeled nanoparticles.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Radio-enhancement by gold nanoparticles and their impact on water radiolysis for x-ray, proton and carbon-ion beams.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
- A Multidisciplinary Approach Toward High Throughput Label-Free Cytotoxicity Monitoring of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Evaluation of dose point kernel rescaling methods for nanoscale dose estimation around gold nanoparticles using Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- In Vitro Methods for Assessing Nanoparticle Toxicity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Computational Modeling and Clonogenic Assay for Radioenhancement of Gold Nanoparticles Using 3D Live Cell Images.Radiation research · 2018Article
- Geometrical structures for radiation biology research as implemented in the TOPAS-nBio toolkit.Physics in medicine and biology · 2018Article
- Metal-basedTheranostics · 2018Review
- Article
- A mechanistic study of gold nanoparticle radiosensitisation using targeted microbeam irradiation.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Validation of the radiobiology toolkit TOPAS-nBio in simple DNA geometries.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2017Article
- Biological mechanisms of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization.Cancer nanotechnology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have shown potential as dose enhancers for radiation therapy. Since damage to the genome affects the viability of a cell, it is generally assumed that GNPs have to localise within the cell nucleus. In practice, however, GNPs tend to localise in the cytoplasm yet still appear to have a dose enhancing effect on the cell. Whether this effect can be attributed to stress-induced biological mechanisms or to physical damage to extra-nuclear cellular targets is still unclear. There is however growing evidence to suggest that the cellular response to radiation can also be influenced by indirect processes induced when the nucleus is not directly targeted by radiation. The mitochondrion in particular may be an effective extra-nuclear radiation target given its many important functional roles in the cell. To more accurately predict the physical effect of radiation within different cell organelles, we measured the full chemical composition of a whole human lymphocytic JURKAT cell as well as two separate organelles; the cell nucleus and the mitochondrion. The experimental measurements found that all three biological materials had similar ionisation energies ∼70 eV, substantially lower than that of liquid water ∼78 eV. Monte Carlo simulations for 10-50 keV incident photons showed higher energy deposition and ionisation numbers in the cell and organelle materials compared to liquid water. Adding a 1% mass fraction of gold to each material increased the energy deposition by a factor of ∼1.8 when averaged over all incident photon energies. Simulations of a realistic compartmentalised cell show that the presence of gold in the cytosol increases the energy deposition in the mitochondrial volume more than within the nuclear volume. We find this is due to sub-micron delocalisation of energy by photoelectrons, making the mitochondria a potentially viable indirect radiation target for GNPs that localise to the cytosol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.