Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27435070›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2016

Imaging in Spondyloarthritis: Controversies in Recognition of Early Disease.

Ulrich Weber, Anne Grethe Jurik, Robert G W Lambert, Walter P Maksymowych

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Imaging of sacroiliitis: Current status, limitations and pitfalls.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ulrich WeberKing Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Toldbodgade 3, DK-6300, Gråsten, Denmark. ulrich.weber02@bluewin.ch.
Anne Grethe JurikInstitute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Robert G W LambertDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.
Walter P MaksymowychDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced imaging has become essential for recognition of clinically suspected early spondyloarthritis. This report summarizes recent progress towards a data-driven comprehensive definition of a positive sacroiliac joint MRI in axial spondyloarthritis, which incorporates contextual information provided by structural lesions alongside with active changes. A focus is on emerging limitations and challenges with increasing use of imaging in spondyloarthritis. We discuss the ongoing controversy as to whether sacroiliac joint MRI due to its superior reliability and ability to depict both structural and active lesions should be the preferred imaging modality in early disease over the traditional approach with pelvic radiographs. Another challenge is transferring the expanding knowledge about imaging evaluation in spondyloarthritis to the community of rheumatologists and radiologists. Advanced imaging modalities will not become the gold standard for diagnosis of spondyloarthritis, which remains a process of composite deduction based on complementary information obtained from clinical, laboratory, and imaging assessment.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSacroiliac JointSpondylarthritisAnkylosing spondylitisDiagnosisImagingMagnetic resonance imagingSpondyloarthritisStructural lesions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.