Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27435067›Full record

Observational studyMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2017

Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in the intensive care unit.

O Coşkun, E Yazici, F Şahiner, A Karakaş, S Kiliç, M Tekin, C Artuk, L Yamanel, B A Beşirbellioğlu

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. EBV DNA increase in COVID-19 patients with impaired lymphocyte subpopulation count.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

O CoşkunDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik/Ankara, Turkey.
E YaziciDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik/Ankara, Turkey.
F ŞahinerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Virology Unit, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.
A KarakaşDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik/Ankara, Turkey. akarakas@gata.edu.tr.
S KiliçDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.
M TekinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.
C ArtukDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik/Ankara, Turkey.
L YamanelDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.
B A BeşirbellioğluDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik/Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe purpose of this work was to evaluate the reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in immunocompetent patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and to identify risk factors associated with reactivation. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this observational prospective study, 60 adult immunocompetent patients who stayed at least 7 days in an ICU were evaluated. During hospitalization, the viral load was monitored at admission and on day 7 with polymerase chain reaction to detect viral reactivation and weekly thereafter on days 14, 21, and 28 if hospitalization continued.

resultsThe mean age of patients was 63.3 years (±23.4 years) and 34 (56.7 %) of them were male. Mean APACHE II scores for patients was 25 at admission. Of these patients, 28 were hospitalized in the internal ICU and 32 were hospitalized in the anesthesiology ICU. CMV/EBV reactivation was found in 17 individuals (12 for EBV, 3 for CMV, and 2 for both). The median high-sensitive C-reactive protein value in patients with CMV reactivation was significantly higher than in those patients without CMV reactivation (p = 0.037). EBV reactivation was statistically higher in patients with mechanical ventilation compared to patients without mechanical ventilation (p = 0.023). EBV reactivation in patients with fever was found to be statistically higher than in the patients without fever (p = 0.035).

conclusionThere is a need for extended studies with a larger number of patients from specific groups to better understand the reactivation frequency and identify risk factors. EBV and CMV reactivation should be taken into consideration in critically ill patients with fever, without specific symptoms and unresponsive to the treatment.

Indexed as

CytomegalovirusHerpesvirus 4, HumanIntensive Care UnitsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overC-Reactive ProteinCytomegalovirus InfectionsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsFemaleHumansImmunocompetenceImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesMaleMiddle AgedC-Reactive ProteinC‑reactive proteinFeverImmunosuppressionMechanical ventilationMortality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.