Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27435026›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2016

Pollination and seed dispersal are the most threatened processes of plant regeneration.

Eike Lena Neuschulz, Thomas Mueller, Matthias Schleuning, Katrin Böhning-Gaese

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Boosting multifunctionality through adaptive trait-based species addition in ongoing restoration projects.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eike Lena NeuschulzSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Thomas MuellerSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Matthias SchleuningSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Katrin Böhning-GaeseSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant regeneration is essential for maintaining forest biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, which are globally threatened by human disturbance. Here we present the first integrative meta-analysis on how forest disturbance affects multiple ecological processes of plant regeneration including pollination, seed dispersal, seed predation, recruitment and herbivory. We analysed 408 pairwise comparisons of these processes between near-natural and disturbed forests. Human impacts overall reduced plant regeneration. Importantly, only processes early in the regeneration cycle that often depend on plant-animal interactions, i.e. pollination and seed dispersal, were negatively affected. Later processes, i.e. seed predation, recruitment and herbivory, showed overall no significant response to human disturbance. Conserving pollination and seed dispersal, including the animals that provide these services to plants, should become a priority in forest conservation efforts globally.

Indexed as

ForestsPlant Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsEcosystemHerbivoryHumansModels, TheoreticalPollinationSeed Dispersal

Identifiers

PMID27435026
PMCPMC4951728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.