Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27434119›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2016

Magnetic resonance imaging based noninvasive measurements of brain hemodynamics in neonates: a review.

Jill B De Vis, Thomas Alderliesten, Jeroen Hendrikse, Esben T Petersen, Manon J N L Benders

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jill B De VisDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Thomas AlderliestenDepartment of Neonatology, Wilhelmina's Children's hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeroen HendrikseDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Esben T PetersenDepartment of Neonatology, Wilhelmina's Children's hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Manon J N L BendersDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perinatal disturbances of brain hemodynamics can have a detrimental effect on the brain's parenchyma with consequently adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Noninvasive, reliable tools to evaluate the neonate's brain hemodynamics are scarce. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging have provided new methods to noninvasively assess brain hemodynamics. More recently these methods have made their transition to the neonatal population. The aim of this review is twofold. Firstly, to describe these newly available noninvasive methods to investigate brain hemodynamics in neonates. Secondly, to discuss the results that were obtained with these techniques, identifying both potential clinical applications as well as gaps of knowledge.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyBrainBrain IschemiaCerebrovascular CirculationHumansHypoxiaInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingNeurodevelopmental DisordersOxygenOxygen

Identifiers

PMID27434119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.