Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27433263›Full record

ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2015

Educating the future sonographic workforce: membership survey report from the British Medical Ultrasound Society.

P C Parker, G Harrison

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05326282 (A Proof of Concept Study Evaluating the Role of Emerging Ultrasound Technologies in the Assessment and Monitoring of Localised Prostate Cancer in Men on an Active Surveillance Programme), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05326282 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Proof of Concept Study Evaluating the Role of Emerging Ultrasound Technologies in the Assessment and Monitoring of Localised Prostate Cancer in Men on an Active Surveillance Programme

TypeinterventionalSponsorHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustRan2021 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsProstate CancerArmsMulti-parametric ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tele-ultrasound in the Era of COVID-19: A Practical Guide.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The clinical ultrasound report: Guideline for sonographers.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2018
    Article
  9. The Public Voluntary Register of Sonographers.Ultrasound (Leeds, England) · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P C ParkerUltrasound Department, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
G HarrisonDivision of Midwifery and Radiography, School of Health Sciences, City University London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS), the Consortium for the Accreditation of Sonographic Education (CASE), education providers and the NHS are working together to review how best to develop education for the future sonographic workforce. There is currently a national vacancy rate of approximately 12% across NHS Trusts. Education course placements are often limited to the number of clinical training places available within departments, resulting in a disparity between vacancies and the numbers of qualified sonographers graduating. Clearly there is a need for education to match the service demand. A term often used as a solution to the workforce problem is 'direct entry' ultrasound education. Anecdotally this term has caused confusion amongst health care professionals and as such the aim of this work was to gain an understanding of the views and opinions of BMUS members and interested professionals about direct entry training and subsequent development of any future training programmes. BMUS undertook an online survey with 286 responses. The survey provided insight into the opinions of ultrasound practitioners and the complexities of developing a relevant educational programme for the future sonographer workforce. The results suggested a number of concerns with direct entry ultrasound programmes, including insufficient training places, lack of health care background knowledge, lack of imaging knowledge and no state registration specific to sonographers. Benefits of direct entry to ultrasound training were perceived to be increasing the number of sonographers trained each year, whilst training people in their first choice profession with skills developed specific to the sonographer role. Support for direct entry ultrasound training was limited to 51% of respondents who would advocate this form of ultrasound training if it led to qualified sonographers with the same skills as sonographers exiting from current CASE accredited programmes.

Indexed as

Direct entrypostgraduate ultrasoundsonographer educationtrainingundergraduate ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID27433263
PMCPMC4760598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.