ReviewUltrasound (Leeds, England)2014
A practical guide to urinary tract ultrasound in a child: Pearls and pitfalls.
Review in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the utility of bulbocavernosus reflex for predicting urological outcome in children with spinal dysraphism surgery.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Observational
- Primary non-refluxing megaureter: Natural history, follow-up and treatment.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Review
- Application of the postnatal urinary tract dilation classification system to predict the need for surgical intervention among neonates and young infants.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
- Prolonged Indwelling Urethral Catheterization as Minimally Invasive Approach for Definitive Treatment of Posterior Urethral Valves in Unstable Premature Babies.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Urinary Ultrasound and Other Imaging for Ureteropelvic Junction Type Hydronephrosis (UPJHN).Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Review
- Pediatric cystic diseases of the kidney.Journal of ultrasound · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this review article is to equip the sonographer with the necessary knowledge to perform a detailed and clinically relevant assessment of the urinary tract in a child. Many of the techniques and principles used in the imaging of the urinary tract in adults can be applied to children. There are, however, notable differences with which the sonographer should be familiar. There is often a certain amount of trepidation when asked to image a child, but there are a number of simple steps that can make the process easier and more fulfilling. This article begins with advice on how to maintain cooperation in a child and the differences in the technical aspects of imaging of children. This is followed by a detailed review of the different pathologies that may be encountered, as well as highlighting information that is particularly relevant to the clinician looking after the child.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.