Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27433158›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Publishing FAIR Data: An Exemplar Methodology Utilizing PHI-Base.

Alejandro Rodríguez-Iglesias, Alejandro Rodríguez-González, Alistair G Irvine, Ane Sesma, Martin Urban, Kim E Hammond-Kosack, Mark D Wilkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alejandro Rodríguez-IglesiasCenter for Plant Biotechnology and Genomics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain.
Alejandro Rodríguez-GonzálezETS de Ingenieros Informáticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain.
Alistair G IrvineDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, Rothamsted Research Harpenden, UK.
Ane SesmaCenter for Plant Biotechnology and Genomics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain.
Martin UrbanDepartment of Plant Biology and Crop Science, Rothamsted Research Harpenden, UK.
Kim E Hammond-KosackDepartment of Plant Biology and Crop Science, Rothamsted Research Harpenden, UK.
Mark D WilkinsonCenter for Plant Biotechnology and Genomics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000488/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogen-Host interaction data is core to our understanding of disease processes and their molecular/genetic bases. Facile access to such core data is particularly important for the plant sciences, where individual genetic and phenotypic observations have the added complexity of being dispersed over a wide diversity of plant species vs. the relatively fewer host species of interest to biomedical researchers. Recently, an international initiative interested in scholarly data publishing proposed that all scientific data should be "FAIR"-Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. In this work, we describe the process of migrating a database of notable relevance to the plant sciences-the Pathogen-Host Interaction Database (PHI-base)-to a form that conforms to each of the FAIR Principles. We discuss the technical and architectural decisions, and the migration pathway, including observations of the difficulty and/or fidelity of each step. We examine how multiple FAIR principles can be addressed simultaneously through careful design decisions, including making data FAIR for both humans and machines with minimal duplication of effort. We note how FAIR data publishing involves more than data reformatting, requiring features beyond those exhibited by most life science Semantic Web or Linked Data resources. We explore the value-added by completing this FAIR data transformation, and then test the result through integrative questions that could not easily be asked over traditional Web-based data resources. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of providing explicit and reliable access to provenance information, which we argue enhances citation rates by encouraging and facilitating transparent scholarly reuse of these valuable data holdings.

Indexed as

data integrationFAIR dataLinked DataPathogen-Host InteractionsPHI-baseSemantic PHI-baseSemantic WebSPARQL

Identifiers

PMID27433158
PMCPMC4922217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.