ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016
Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06036862 (A Prospective Clinical Study of Transanal and Transabdominal Combined Endoscopic Resection of Rectal Stenosis and Anal Reconstruction for Severe Rectal Anastomotic Stenosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Clinical Study of Transanal and Transabdominal Combined Endoscopic Resection of Rectal Stenosis and Anal Reconstruction for Severe Rectal Anastomotic Stenosis
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures in reducing anastomotic leakage risk after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a pooled and integration analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of intraoperative anastomotic reinforcement suture on the prevention of anastomotic leakage of double-stapling anastomosis for laparoscopic rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- The efficacy of intraoperative ICG fluorescence angiography on anastomotic leak after resection for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- The use of robotic or laparoscopic stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2020Pooled it
- The application of defunctioning stomas after low anterior resection of rectal cancer.Surgery today · 2019Pooled it
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model to predict multiple firings in double-stapled colorectal anastomosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Trial
- The effects of intraoperative ICG fluorescence angiography in laparoscopic low anterior resection: a propensity score-matched study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2019Trial
- Sex differences in the risk profiles for anastomotic leakage following surgery for rectal cancer.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Utilization of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in redo IPAA surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Transanal drainage tube placement in patients with temporary ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer with preservation of the left colic artery.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Intraoperative NIR-II fluorescence imaging for assessment of bowel vascular morphology and inflammatory severity in Hirschsprung's disease.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Risk factor analysis and nomogram model development for anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic radical colorectal cancer surgery.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Does the management of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection affect long-term oncological survival? A retrospective propensity score-adjusted cohort study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Observational
- Invited Commentary: Reducing the Risk of Anastomotic Leak After Rectal Cancer Resection.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of nomogram about conversion from temporary to permanent stoma in rectal cancer based on machine learning and traditional model-does robotic surgery have competitive advantages?Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative clinical and laboratory factors associated with early complications after low anterior resection: Exploratory analysis of the eosinophil/lymphocyte ratio.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical prediction model for anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: a single-center large-sample cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Comparative retrospective study on surgical outcomes of hand-sewn anastomosis versus stapling anastomosis for colectomy using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan with propensity score matching.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- A break in the line: anastomotic leak triggered by a traumatic fall.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most devastating complications after rectal cancer surgery. The double stapling technique has greatly facilitated intestinal reconstruction especially for anastomosis after low anterior resection (LAR). Risk factor analyses for AL after open LAR have been widely reported. However, a few studies have analyzed the risk factors for AL after laparoscopic LAR. Laparoscopic rectal surgery provides an excellent operative field in a narrow pelvic space, and enables total mesorectal excision surgery and preservation of the autonomic nervous system with greater precision. However, rectal transection using a laparoscopic linear stapler is relatively difficult compared with open surgery because of the width and limited performance of the linear stapler. Moreover, laparoscopic LAR exhibits a different postoperative course compared with open LAR, which suggests that the risk factors for AL after laparoscopic LAR may also differ from those after open LAR. In this review, we will discuss the risk factors for AL after laparoscopic LAR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.