ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of drinking Chinese green tea on postoperative short outcomes for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Trial
- Evolution of surgical robotics innovation in China: a patent landscape analysis, 2003-2025.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive surgery for remnant gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective study of treatment outcomes in Japan.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of articulating laparoscopic instrument-assisted gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy on perioperative and oncologic outcomes compared with conventional laparoscopy: a propensity score matching analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- A review of wrist mechanism design and the application in gastrointestinal minimally invasive surgery of multi-degree-of-freedom surgical laparoscopic instruments.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- RETRACTED: Effects of enhanced recovery after surgery nursing program on the surgical site wound infection and postoperative complications in patients of gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Robotic Revolution in Surgery: Diverse Applications Across Specialties and Future Prospects Review Article.Cureus · 2024Review
- Robotic versus open approach in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comparative single-center study of perioperative outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Early Gastric Cancer: Update on Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Improving disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment using novel bionic technologies.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- Ten-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study Utilizing Machine Learning Algorithms to Identify Patients at High Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Radical Gastrectomy.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Short and Long-Term Results.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Reduced-port robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-institute experience.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic vs. Open Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Case-Control Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- HIPPO signaling-related signature for predicting prognosis and therapeutic response in gastric cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Influence of Deep Neuromuscular Blockade on Perioperative Stress Response in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized-Controlled Trial.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Robotic versus open oncological gastric surgery in the elderly: a propensity score-matched analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2021Article
- Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer: Case series of initial experience.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radical gastrectomy with an adequate lymphadenectomy is the main procedure which makes it possible to cure patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC). A number of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis provide phase III evidence that laparoscopic gastrectomy is technically safe and that it yields better short-term outcomes than conventional open gastrectomy for early-stage GC. While laparoscopic gastrectomy has become standard therapy for early-stage GC, especially in Asian countries such as Japan and South Korea, the use of minimally invasive techniques is still controversial for the treatment of more advanced tumours, principally due to existing concerns about its oncological adequacy and capacity to carry out an adequately extended lymphadenectomy. Some intrinsic drawbacks of the conventional laparoscopic technique have prevented the worldwide spread of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer and, despite technological advances in recent year, it remains a technically challenging procedure. The introduction of robotic surgery over the last ten years has implied a notable mutation of certain minimally invasive procedures, making it possible to overcome some limitations of the traditional laparoscopic technique. Robot-assisted gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection has been shown to be safe and feasible in prospective and retrospective studies. However, to date there are no high quality comparative studies investigating the advantages of a robotic approach to GC over traditional laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. On the basis of the literature review here presented, robot-assisted surgery seems to fulfill oncologic criteria for D2 dissection and has a comparable oncologic outcome to traditional laparoscopic and open procedure. Robot-assisted gastrectomy was associated with the trend toward a shorter hospital stay with a comparable morbidity of conventional laparoscopic and open gastrectomy, but randomized clinical trials and longer follow-ups are needed to evaluate the possible influence of robot gastrectomy on GC patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.