Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27432984›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Evolutionary lessons from California plant phylogeography.

Victoria L Sork, Paul F Gugger, Jin-Ming Chen, Silke Werth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Oaks: an evolutionary success story.The New phytologist · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In the light of evolution X: Comparative phylogeography.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Victoria L SorkDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239; Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1496; vlsork@ucla.edu.
Paul F GuggerAppalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, MD 21532;ORCID 0000-0002-4464-8453
Jin-Ming ChenKey Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China;
Silke WerthInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4981-7850
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Graz · ATUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogeography documents the spatial distribution of genetic lineages that result from demographic processes, such as population expansion, population contraction, and gene movement, shaped by climate fluctuations and the physical landscape. Because most phylogeographic studies have used neutral markers, the role of selection may have been undervalued. In this paper, we contend that plants provide a useful evolutionary lesson about the impact of selection on spatial patterns of neutral genetic variation, when the environment affects which individuals can colonize new sites, and on adaptive genetic variation, when environmental heterogeneity creates divergence at specific loci underlying local adaptation. Specifically, we discuss five characteristics found in plants that intensify the impact of selection: sessile growth form, high reproductive output, leptokurtic dispersal, isolation by environment, and the potential to evolve longevity. Collectively, these traits exacerbate the impact of environment on movement between populations and local selection pressures-both of which influence phylogeographic structure. We illustrate how these unique traits shape these processes with case studies of the California endemic oak, Quercus lobata, and the western North American lichen, Ramalina menziesii Obviously, the lessons we learn from plant traits are not unique to plants, but they highlight the need for future animal, plant, and microbe studies to incorporate its impact. Modern tools that generate genome-wide sequence data are now allowing us to decipher how evolutionary processes affect the spatial distribution of different kinds of genes and also to better model future spatial distribution of species in response to climate change.

Indexed as

CaliforniaDNA, PlantEvolution, MolecularLichensPhylogeographyQuercusDNA, PlantCalifornia Floristic Provincecomparative phylogeogeographycomparative phylogeographyglaciationlocal adaptationmigration

Identifiers

PMID27432984
PMCPMC4961205
OpenAlexW2480538348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.