Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27432963›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Comparative phylogeography of the ocean planet.

Brian W Bowen, Michelle R Gaither, Joseph D DiBattista, Matthew Iacchei, Kimberly R Andrews, W Stewart Grant, Robert J Toonen, John C Briggs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 269 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phylogenetic systematics of the genusZoological journal of the Linnean Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Brian W BowenHawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawai'i, Kaneohe, HI 96744; bbowen@hawaii.edu.
Michelle R GaitherSchool of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom;
Joseph D DiBattistaDepartment of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia;
Matthew IaccheiHawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawai'i, Kaneohe, HI 96744; Department of Oceanography, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822;
Kimberly R AndrewsDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844;
W Stewart GrantCommercial Fisheries Division, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage, AK 99518;
Robert J ToonenHawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawai'i, Kaneohe, HI 96744;
John C BriggsDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97333.
University of Hawaii System · USAlaska Department of Fish and Game · USCurtin University · AUDurham University · GBOregon State University · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Idaho · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how geography, oceanography, and climate have ultimately shaped marine biodiversity requires aligning the distributions of genetic diversity across multiple taxa. Here, we examine phylogeographic partitions in the sea against a backdrop of biogeographic provinces defined by taxonomy, endemism, and species composition. The taxonomic identities used to define biogeographic provinces are routinely accompanied by diagnostic genetic differences between sister species, indicating interspecific concordance between biogeography and phylogeography. In cases where individual species are distributed across two or more biogeographic provinces, shifts in genotype frequencies often align with biogeographic boundaries, providing intraspecific concordance between biogeography and phylogeography. Here, we provide examples of comparative phylogeography from (i) tropical seas that host the highest marine biodiversity, (ii) temperate seas with high productivity but volatile coastlines, (iii) migratory marine fauna, and (iv) plankton that are the most abundant eukaryotes on earth. Tropical and temperate zones both show impacts of glacial cycles, the former primarily through changing sea levels, and the latter through coastal habitat disruption. The general concordance between biogeography and phylogeography indicates that the population-level genetic divergences observed between provinces are a starting point for macroevolutionary divergences between species. However, isolation between provinces does not account for all marine biodiversity; the remainder arises through alternative pathways, such as ecological speciation and parapatric (semiisolated) divergences within provinces and biodiversity hotspots.

Indexed as

PhylogeographyAnimalsAquatic OrganismsOceans and Seasbiogeographycoral reefsevolutionmarine biodiversityspeciation

Identifiers

PMID27432963
PMCPMC4961182
OpenAlexW2500547374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.