Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27432956›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Reticulation, divergence, and the phylogeography-phylogenetics continuum.

Scott V Edwards, Sally Potter, C Jonathan Schmitt, Jason G Bragg, Craig Moritz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Candidate-species delimitation inEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Morphological ghosts of introgression in Darwin's finch populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Scott V EdwardsDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; sedwards@fas.harvard.edu.
Sally PotterResearch School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity Analysis, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
C Jonathan SchmittDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
Jason G BraggResearch School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity Analysis, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Craig MoritzResearch School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity Analysis, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research · AUAustralian National University · AUHarvard University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

NSF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogeography, and its extensions into comparative phylogeography, have their roots in the layering of gene trees across geography, a paradigm that was greatly facilitated by the nonrecombining, fast evolution provided by animal mtDNA. As phylogeography moves into the era of next-generation sequencing, the specter of reticulation at several levels-within loci and genomes in the form of recombination and across populations and species in the form of introgression-has raised its head with a prominence even greater than glimpsed during the nuclear gene PCR era. Here we explore the theme of reticulation in comparative phylogeography, speciation analysis, and phylogenomics, and ask how the centrality of gene trees has fared in the next-generation era. To frame these issues, we first provide a snapshot of multilocus phylogeographic studies across the Carpentarian Barrier, a prominent biogeographic barrier dividing faunas spanning the monsoon tropics in northern Australia. We find that divergence across this barrier is evident in most species, but is heterogeneous in time and demographic history, often reflecting the taxonomic distinctness of lineages spanning it. We then discuss a variety of forces generating reticulate patterns in phylogeography, including introgression, contact zones, and the potential selection-driven outliers on next-generation molecular markers. We emphasize the continued need for demographic models incorporating reticulation at the level of genomes and populations, and conclude that gene trees, whether explicit or implicit, should continue to play a role in the future of phylogeography.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsAustraliaGenetic VariationPhylogeographyRecombination, Geneticcoalescent theorycomparative phylogeographyintrogressionmonsoon tropicsspecies trees

Identifiers

PMID27432956
PMCPMC4961137
OpenAlexW2479158703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.