Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27432945›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Geogenetic patterns in mouse lemurs (genus Microcebus) reveal the ghosts of Madagascar's forests past.

Anne D Yoder, C Ryan Campbell, Marina B Blanco, Mario Dos Reis, Jörg U Ganzhorn, Steven M Goodman, Kelsie E Hunnicutt, Peter A Larsen, Peter M Kappeler, Rodin M Rasoloarison and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. eLemur: A cellular-resolution 3D atlas of the mouse lemur brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anne D YoderDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; Duke Lemur Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705; anne.yoder@duke.edu.
C Ryan CampbellDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;
Marina B BlancoDuke Lemur Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705;
Mario Dos ReisSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom;
Jörg U GanzhornTierökologie und Naturschutz, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany;
Steven M GoodmanField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605; Association Vahatra, BP 3972, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar;
Kelsie E HunnicuttDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;
Peter A LarsenDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;
Peter M KappelerBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Centre, 37077 Goettingen, Germany;
Rodin M RasoloarisonBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Centre, 37077 Goettingen, Germany; Département de Biologie Animale, Université d'Antananarivo, BP 906, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar;
José M RalisonDépartement de Biologie Animale, Université d'Antananarivo, BP 906, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar;
David L SwoffordDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;
David W WeisrockDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogeographic analysis can be described as the study of the geological and climatological processes that have produced contemporary geographic distributions of populations and species. Here, we attempt to understand how the dynamic process of landscape change on Madagascar has shaped the distribution of a targeted clade of mouse lemurs (genus Microcebus) and, conversely, how phylogenetic and population genetic patterns in these small primates can reciprocally advance our understanding of Madagascar's prehuman environment. The degree to which human activity has impacted the natural plant communities of Madagascar is of critical and enduring interest. Today, the eastern rainforests are separated from the dry deciduous forests of the west by a large expanse of presumed anthropogenic grassland savanna, dominated by the Family Poaceae, that blankets most of the Central Highlands. Although there is firm consensus that anthropogenic activities have transformed the original vegetation through agricultural and pastoral practices, the degree to which closed-canopy forest extended from the east to the west remains debated. Phylogenetic and population genetic patterns in a five-species clade of mouse lemurs suggest that longitudinal dispersal across the island was readily achieved throughout the Pleistocene, apparently ending at ∼55 ka. By examining patterns of both inter- and intraspecific genetic diversity in mouse lemur species found in the eastern, western, and Central Highland zones, we conclude that the natural environment of the Central Highlands would have been mosaic, consisting of a matrix of wooded savanna that formed a transitional zone between the extremes of humid eastern and dry western forest types.

Indexed as

AnimalsCheirogaleidaeDNA, MitochondrialForestsMadagascarPhylogenyPhylogeographyDNA, Mitochondrialclimate changeddRADdeforestationphylogeographyspeciation

Identifiers

PMID27432945
PMCPMC4961119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.