Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27431570›Full record

Trial reportIntegrative cancer therapies2017

A Randomized Controlled Study to Observe the Efficacy of External Treatment With a Traditional Chinese Medicine Herbal Ointment on Malignant Plural Effusion: Outcome Report and Design Review.

Wu Feize, Liu Meng, Lou Yanni, Li Yuan, Jia Liqun, Li Tong, Yang Guowang, Cui Huijuan, Wan Donggui, Cheng Zhiqiang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Integrative cancer therapies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wu Feize1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Liu Meng2 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lou Yanni2 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li Yuan2 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jia Liqun2 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li Tong3 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yang Guowang4 Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Cui Huijuan2 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wan Donggui2 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Cheng Zhiqiang2 China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zheng Lei1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication in most malignancies. Despite its frequent occurrence, current knowledge of MPE remains limited and the effect of the management is still unsatisfying. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) external treatment has unique advantages, such as quicker efficacy and fewer side effects.

objectiveTo observe the effects and safety of Kang'ai Xiaoshui ointment (TCM herbal ointment) in MPE.

designThis was a placebo-controlled double-blinded randomized study. A total of 80 patients were enrolled, of which 72 were randomized to receive Kang'ai Xiaoshui ointment or placebo at an allocation ratio of 1:1. Kang'ai Xiaoshui ointment or placebo was applied on the thorax wall for 8 hours daily. The intervention lasted 2 weeks. Kang'ai Xiaoshui ointment consisted of Astragalus membranaces (), Semen pharbitidis (), Cassia twig (), Pericarpium arecae (), Curcuma zedoary (), Borneol (), and other substances. In both groups, diuresis and drainages were used as needed. Outcomes covered the quantity of pleural effusion evaluation, TCM Symptom Scale, Karnofsky Performance Scale, and safety indicators such as routine blood test, blood biochemistry test, and response table of skin irritation.

resultsOf 72 patients randomized to receive Kang'ai Xiaoshui ointment or placebo along with symptomatic treatment, the response rate was documented as 42.4% for the treatment group and 25.0% for the placebo group ( P = .138). As for the TCM symptom scale, the treatment group showed improvement in chest distress ( P = .003), fullness and distention ( P = .042), shortness of breath ( P < .001), no statistical significance in palpitation ( P = .237), and pain ( P = .063), whereas the placebo group did not show statistical significance in any of the 5 symptoms. Major adverse events related to the treatment, mainly skin irritation, were distributed equally.

conclusionsKang'ai Xiaoshui ointment showed a potential of reducing MPE, and it could alleviate symptoms of dyspnea. Thus, it may be appropriate as a supplementary intervention for MPE. There were some flaws in the study design. A larger scale and better designed trial is advocated.

Indexed as

AgedDouble-Blind MethodDrugs, Chinese HerbalFemaleHumansMaleMedicine, Chinese TraditionalMiddle AgedOintmentsPleural Effusion, MalignantTreatment OutcomeDrugs, Chinese HerbalOintmentsexternal treatmentmalignant plural effusionpalliative treatmentRCTtraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID27431570
PMCPMC5739134
OpenAlexW2478978898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.