ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2016
Using the weighted area under the net benefit curve for decision curve analysis.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two web-based dynamically interactive nomograms and risk stratification systems for predicting survival outcomes and guiding treatment in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Trial
- Why decision curves cross treat-all and treat-none: A PPV and calibration perspective.Global epidemiology · 2026Article
- The continuous net benefit: assessing the clinical utility of prediction models when informing a continuum of decisions.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive in-hospital mortality nomogram in patients with staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating clinical utility of multi-category outcome risk prediction models.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- A novel prognostic model to predict prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma based on clinical characteristics and blood biomarkers.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
- FRID-PI: a machine learning model for diagnosing fracture-related infections based onFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Climate change and its impact on wheat distribution in semi-arid ecosystems: A case study from the Sultanate of Oman.PloS one · 2025Article
- Application value of dual-sequence MRI based nomogram of radiomics and morphologic features in predicting tumor differentiation degree and lymph node metastasis of Oral squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A machine learning model for predicting postoperative complication risk in young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical utility of bedside Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of pneumonia in elderly patients: Comparison with clinical, -radiological and ultrasound diagnosis.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2024Article
- Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
- Nomogram for predicting the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in older adults in Qingdao, China: A cross-sectional study.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Article
- Article
- Predictive nomogram models for unfavorable prognosis after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Analysis from a prospective, observational cohort in China.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2023Observational
- The modified lymphocyte C-reactive protein score is a promising indicator for predicting 3-year mortality in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Identifying treatment heterogeneity in atrial fibrillation using a novel causal machine learning method.American heart journal · 2023Article
- Using genomic scars to select immunotherapy beneficiaries in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Increases prognostic value of clinical-pathological nomogram in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Increased prognostic value of clinical-reproductive model in Chinese female patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRisk prediction models have been proposed for various diseases and are being improved as new predictors are identified. A major challenge is to determine whether the newly discovered predictors improve risk prediction. Decision curve analysis has been proposed as an alternative to the area under the curve and net reclassification index to evaluate the performance of prediction models in clinical scenarios. The decision curve computed using the net benefit can evaluate the predictive performance of risk models at a given or range of threshold probabilities. However, when the decision curves for 2 competing models cross in the range of interest, it is difficult to identify the best model as there is no readily available summary measure for evaluating the predictive performance. The key deterrent for using simple measures such as the area under the net benefit curve is the assumption that the threshold probabilities are uniformly distributed among patients.
methodsWe propose a novel measure for performing decision curve analysis. The approach estimates the distribution of threshold probabilities without the need of additional data. Using the estimated distribution of threshold probabilities, the weighted area under the net benefit curve serves as the summary measure to compare risk prediction models in a range of interest.
resultsWe compared 3 different approaches, the standard method, the area under the net benefit curve, and the weighted area under the net benefit curve. Type 1 error and power comparisons demonstrate that the weighted area under the net benefit curve has higher power compared to the other methods. Several simulation studies are presented to demonstrate the improvement in model comparison using the weighted area under the net benefit curve compared to the standard method.
conclusionsThe proposed measure improves decision curve analysis by using the weighted area under the curve and thereby improves the power of the decision curve analysis to compare risk prediction models in a clinical scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.