Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27431326›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

Insertion sequence-caused large-scale rearrangements in the genome of Escherichia coli.

Heewook Lee, Thomas G Doak, Ellen Popodi, Patricia L Foster, Haixu Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Microbial genomics · 2024
    Article
  15. Draft genome sequence of a Shiga toxin-producingMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heewook LeeSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA Computational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Thomas G DoakDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA National Center for Genome Analysis Support, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.
Ellen PopodiDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.
Patricia L FosterDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.
Haixu TangSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA hatang@indiana.edu.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A majority of large-scale bacterial genome rearrangements involve mobile genetic elements such as insertion sequence (IS) elements. Here we report novel insertions and excisions of IS elements and recombination between homologous IS elements identified in a large collection of Escherichia coli mutation accumulation lines by analysis of whole genome shotgun sequencing data. Based on 857 identified events (758 IS insertions, 98 recombinations and 1 excision), we estimate that the rate of IS insertion is 3.5 × 10(-4) insertions per genome per generation and the rate of IS homologous recombination is 4.5 × 10(-5) recombinations per genome per generation. These events are mostly contributed by the IS elements IS1, IS2, IS5 and IS186 Spatial analysis of new insertions suggest that transposition is biased to proximal insertions, and the length spectrum of IS-caused deletions is largely explained by local hopping. For any of the ISs studied there is no region of the circular genome that is favored or disfavored for new insertions but there are notable hotspots for deletions. Some elements have preferences for non-coding sequence or for the beginning and end of coding regions, largely explained by target site motifs. Interestingly, transposition and deletion rates remain constant across the wild-type and 12 mutant E. coli lines, each deficient in a distinct DNA repair pathway. Finally, we characterized the target sites of four IS families, confirming previous results and characterizing a highly specific pattern at IS186 target-sites, 5'-GGGG(N6/N7)CCCC-3'. We also detected 48 long deletions not involving IS elements.

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNA Transposable ElementsEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialMutagenesis, InsertionalDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID27431326
PMCPMC5009759
OpenAlexW2485242605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.