Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27431221›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Daptomycin Improves Outcomes Regardless of Vancomycin MIC in a Propensity-Matched Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.

Kimberly C Claeys, Evan J Zasowski, Anthony M Casapao, Abdalhamid M Lagnf, Jerod L Nagel, Cynthia T Nguyen, Jessica A Hallesy, Mathew T Compton, Keith S Kaye, Donald P Levine and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Evaluation of Changes inOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Infective Endocarditis in the Elderly: Challenges and Strategies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. High-Dose Daptomycin and Clinical Applications.The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Early Switch From Vancomycin to Daptomycin in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Still More Questions Than Answers.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly C ClaeysAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Evan J ZasowskiAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Anthony M CasapaoAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Abdalhamid M LagnfAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Jerod L NagelDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Michigan Hospital and Health Centers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Cynthia T NguyenDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Michigan Hospital and Health Centers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jessica A HallesyAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Mathew T ComptonAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Keith S KayeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Donald P LevineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Susan L DavisDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA Department of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Health-System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Michael J RybakAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA m.rybak@wayne.edu.
Wayne State University · USEugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Impact of daptomycin dose exposure on biofilm embedded Enterococci resistanceR21AI109266 · NIAID · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RYBAK, MICHAEL JOSEPH · 2014 to 2015
$380k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI109266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vancomycin remains the mainstay treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) despite increased treatment failures. Daptomycin has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with BSIs caused by MRSA isolates with vancomycin MICs of >1 mg/liter, but these studies relied on automated testing systems. We evaluated the outcomes of BSIs caused by MRSA isolates for which vancomycin MICs were determined by standard broth microdilution (BMD). A retrospective, matched cohort of patients with MRSA BSIs treated with vancomycin or daptomycin from January 2010 to March 2015 was completed. Patients were matched using propensity-adjusted logistic regression, which included age, Pitt bacteremia score, primary BSI source, and hospital of care. The primary endpoint was clinical failure, which was a composite endpoint of the following metrics: 30-day mortality, bacteremia with a duration of ≥7 days, or a change in anti-MRSA therapy due to persistent or worsening signs or symptoms. Secondary endpoints included MRSA-attributable mortality and the number of days of MRSA bacteremia. Independent predictors of failure were determined through conditional backwards-stepwise logistic regression with vancomycin BMD MIC forced into the model. A total of 262 patients were matched. Clinical failure was significantly higher in the vancomycin cohort than in the daptomycin cohort (45.0% versus 29.0%; P = 0.007). All-cause 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the vancomycin cohort (15.3% versus 6.1%; P = 0.024). These outcomes remained significant when stratified by vancomycin BMD MIC. There was no significant difference in the length of MRSA bacteremia. Variables independently associated with treatment failure included vancomycin therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24 to 3.76), intensive care unit admission (aOR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.34 to 4.54), and infective endocarditis as the primary source (aOR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.16 to 4.68). Treatment of MRSA BSIs with daptomycin was associated with reduced clinical failure and 30-day mortality; these findings were independent of vancomycin BMD MIC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaCohort StudiesDaptomycinHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcal InfectionsTreatment OutcomeVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsDaptomycinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID27431221
PMCPMC5038271
OpenAlexW2521252357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.