ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2016
Comparison of clinical MRI liver iron content measurements using signal intensity ratios, R
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of T2* and DWI-IVIM to distinguish inflammatory and noninflammatory strictures in Crohn's disease: a prospective cross-sectional cohort study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Metrology for MRI: the field you've never heard of.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Cascade of Denoising and Mapping Neural Networks for MRI R2* Relaxometry of Iron-Loaded Liver.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of MRI technique on clinical decision-making in patients with liver iron overload: comparison of FerriScan- versus R2*-derived liver iron concentration.European radiology · 2020Article
- Evaluation of liver tissue by ultrasound elastography and clinical parameters in children with multiple blood cell transfusions.Pediatric radiology · 2019Article
- Feasibility and agreement of stiffness measurements using gradient-echo and spin-echo MR elastography sequences in unselected patients undergoing liver MRI.The British journal of radiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare three types of MRI liver iron content (LIC) measurement performed in daily clinical routine in a single center over a 6-year period.
methodsPatients undergoing LIC MRI-scans (1.5T) at our center between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2013 were retrospectively included. LIC was measured routinely with signal intensity ratio (SIR) and MR-relaxometry (R
resultsLIC MRI-scans were performed in 114 subjects. SIR, R
conclusionsSIR and R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.