Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27430977›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2016

Rumen fluke in Irish sheep: prevalence, risk factors and molecular identification of two paramphistome species.

Ana Maria Martinez-Ibeas, Maria Pia Munita, Kim Lawlor, Mary Sekiya, Grace Mulcahy, Riona Sayers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Amphistomes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  7. First Molecular Identification ofVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rumen (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  14. Chronic Wasting Due to Liver and Rumen Flukes in Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Maria Martinez-IbeasAnimal and Biosciences Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland. anamaria_mi@hotmail.com.
Maria Pia MunitaAnimal and Biosciences Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Kim LawlorSchool of Veterinary Medicine UCD, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Mary SekiyaSchool of Veterinary Medicine UCD, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Grace MulcahySchool of Veterinary Medicine UCD, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Riona SayersAnimal and Biosciences Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRumen flukes are trematode parasites found globally; in tropical and sub-tropical climates, infection can result in paramphistomosis, which can have a deleterious impact on livestock. In Europe, rumen fluke is not regarded as a clinically significant parasite, recently however, the prevalence of rumen fluke has sharply increased and several outbreaks of clinical paramphistomosis have been reported. Gaining a better understanding of rumen fluke transmission and identification of risk factors is crucial to improve the control of this parasitic disease. In this regard, a national prevalence study of rumen fluke infection and an investigation of associated risk factors were conducted in Irish sheep flocks between November 2014 and January 2015. In addition, a molecular identification of the rumen fluke species present in Ireland was carried out using an isolation method of individual eggs from faecal material coupled with a PCR. After the DNA extraction of 54 individual eggs, the nuclear fragment ITS-2 was amplified and sequenced using the same primers.

resultsAn apparent herd prevalence of 77.3 % was determined. Several risk factors were identified including type of pasture grazed, regional variation, and sharing of the paddocks with other livestock species. A novel relationship between the Suffolk breed and higher FEC was reported for the first time. The predominant rumen fluke species found was C. daubneyi. Nevertheless, P. leydeni was unexpectedly identified infecting sheep in Ireland for the first time.

conclusionsAn exceptionally high prevalence of rumen fluke among Irish sheep flocks has been highlighted in this study and a more thorough investigation is necessary to analyse its economic impact. The isolation of individual eggs coupled with the PCR technique used here has proven a reliable tool for discrimination of Paramphistomum spp. This technique may facilitate forthcoming studies of the effects of paramphistomosis on livestock production. The most noteworthy finding was the identification of P. leydeni affecting sheep in Ireland, however further studies are required to clarify its implications. Also, a significant relationship between Suffolk breed and a heavier infection was found, which can be used as a starting point for future research on control strategies of rumen fluke infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA, HelminthFecesFemaleIrelandParamphistomatidaeParasite Egg CountPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceRisk FactorsRumenSheepSheep DiseasesSurveys and QuestionnairesTrematode InfectionsDNA, HelminthCalicophoron daubneyiParamphistomum leydeniPCRPrevalenceRumen fluke

Identifiers

PMID27430977
PMCPMC4950795
OpenAlexW2479975408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.