Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27430748›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2016

Non-invasive metabolic imaging of brain tumours in the era of precision medicine.

Michelle M Kim, Abhijit Parolia, Mark P Dunphy, Sriram Venneti

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A bis-boron boramino acid PET tracer for brain tumor diagnosis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Feasibility of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle M KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, University of Michigan.
Abhijit ParoliaDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Health System, University of Michigan, 3520E Medical Science Research Building 1, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USA.
Mark P DunphyMolecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Sriram VennetiDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Health System, University of Michigan, 3520E Medical Science Research Building 1, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Biomarkers for predicting response to Hsp90 therapyR01CA172546 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHIOSIS, GABRIELA, DUNPHY, MARK P. · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
Unraveling glutamine metabolism in gliomas by PET imaging and biochemical methodsK08CA181475 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VENNETI, SRIRAM · 2014 to 2018
$701k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA181475NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The revolution in cancer genomics has uncovered a variety of clinically relevant mutations in primary brain tumours, creating an urgent need to develop non-invasive imaging biomarkers to assess and integrate this genetic information into the clinical management of patients. Metabolic reprogramming is a central hallmark of cancer, including brain tumours; indeed, many of the molecular pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of brain tumours result in reprogramming of metabolism. This relationship provides the opportunity to devise in vivo metabolic imaging modalities to improve diagnosis, patient stratification, and monitoring of treatment response. Metabolic phenomena, such as the Warburg effect and altered mitochondrial metabolism, can be leveraged to image brain tumours using techniques including PET and MRI. Moreover, genetic alterations, such as mutations affecting isocitrate dehydrogenase, are associated with unique metabolic signatures that can be detected using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The need to translate our understanding of the molecular features of brain tumours into imaging modalities with clinical utility is growing; metabolic imaging provides a unique platform to achieve this objective. In this Review, we examine the molecular basis for metabolic reprogramming in brain tumours, and examine current non-invasive metabolic imaging strategies that can be used to interrogate these molecular characteristics with the ultimate goal of guiding and improving patient care.

Indexed as

AdultAmino AcidsBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCell HypoxiaCell ProliferationChildCitric Acid CycleDisease ProgressionFatty AcidsGenome, HumanGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMutationAmino AcidsBiomarkers, TumorFatty Acids

Identifiers

PMID27430748
PMCPMC5115958
OpenAlexW2497583477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.