Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27430374›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2016

Comparison of artesunate-mefloquine and artemether-lumefantrine fixed-dose combinations for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in children younger than 5 years in sub-Saharan Africa: a randomised, multicentre, phase 4 trial.

Sodiomon B Sirima, Bernhards Ogutu, John P A Lusingu, Ali Mtoro, Zakayo Mrango, Alphonse Ouedraogo, Jean Baptiste Yaro, Kevin Omondi Onyango, Samwel Gesase, Ernest Mnkande and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Polymorphisms in the K13 Gene inThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sodiomon B SirimaCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme (CNRFP), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Bernhards OgutuKenya Medical Research Institute (CCR-KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya.
John P A LusinguNational Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Korogwe, Tanzania.
Ali MtoroIfakara Health Institute (IHI), Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Zakayo MrangoNational Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Kilosa, Tanzania.
Alphonse OuedraogoCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme (CNRFP), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Jean Baptiste YaroCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme (CNRFP), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Kevin Omondi OnyangoKenya Medical Research Institute (CCR-KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya.
Samwel GesaseNational Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Korogwe, Tanzania.
Ernest MnkandeIfakara Health Institute (IHI), Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
James Samwel NgochoNational Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Kilosa, Tanzania.
Isabelle AckermannVenn Life Sciences, Paris, France.
François AubinVenn Life Sciences, Paris, France.
Joelle VanraesDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Nathalie StrubDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Gwenaelle CarnDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: gwen.carn@gmail.com.
National Institute for Medical Research · TZCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme · BFDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative · CHIfakara Health Institute · TZKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWHO recommends combinations of an artemisinin derivative plus an antimalarial drug of longer half-life as treatment options for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum infection. In Africa, artemether-lumefantrine is the most widely used artemisinin-based combination therapy, whereas artesunate-mefloquine is used infrequently because of a perceived poor tolerance to mefloquine. WHO recommends reconsideration of the use of artesunate-mefloquine in Africa. We compared the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose artesunate-mefloquine with that of artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of children younger than 5 years with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria.

methodsWe did this multicentre, phase 4, open-label, non-inferiority trial in Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Tanzania. Children aged 6-59 months with uncomplicated malaria were randomly assigned (1:1), via a computer-generated randomisation list, to receive 3 days' treatment with either one or two artesunate-mefloquine tablets (25 mg artesunate and 55 mg mefloquine) once a day or one or two artemether-lumefantrine tablets (20 mg artemether and 120 mg lumefantrine) twice a day. Parasitological assessments were done independently by two microscopists who were blinded to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the PCR-corrected rate of adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) at day 63 in the per-protocol population. Non-inferiority was shown if the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference between groups was greater than -5%. Early vomiting was monitored and neuropsychiatric status assessed regularly during follow-up. This study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN17472707, and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201202000278282.

findings945 children were enrolled and randomised, 473 to artesunate-mefloquine and 472 to artemether-lumefantrine. The per-protocol population consisted of 407 children in each group. The PCR-corrected ACPR rate at day 63 was 90·9% (370 patients) in the artesunate-mefloquine group and 89·7% (365 patients) in the artemether-lumefantrine group (treatment difference 1·23%, 95% CI -2·84% to 5·29%). At 72 h after the start of treatment, no child had detectable parasitaemia and less than 6% had fever, with a similar number in each group (21 in the artesunate-mefloquine group vs 24 in the artemether-lumefantrine group). The safety profiles of artesunate-mefloquine and artemether-lumefantrine were similar, with low rates of early vomiting (71 [15·3%] of 463 patients in the artesunate-mefloquine group vs 79 [16·8%] of 471 patients in the artemether-lumefantrine group in any of the three dosing days), few neurological adverse events (ten [2·1%] of 468 vs five [1·1%] of 465), and no detectable psychiatric adverse events.

interpretationArtesunate-mefloquine is effective and safe, and an important treatment option, for children younger than 5 years with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria in Africa.

fundingAgence Française de Développement, France; Department for International Development, UK; Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Netherlands; European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership; Fondation Arpe, Switzerland; Médecins Sans Frontières; Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Switzerland.

Indexed as

Africa South of the SaharaAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemisininsArtesunateChild, PreschoolEthanolaminesFemaleFluorenesHumansInfantLumefantrineMalaria, FalciparumMaleMefloquinePatient SafetyAntimalarialsArtemetherartemisininArtemisininsArtesunateEthanolaminesFluorenesLumefantrineMefloquine

Identifiers

PMID27430374
PMCPMC5030279
OpenAlexW2465562385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.