ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2017
Impact of microsatellite alteration in surgical margins on local recurrence in oral cavity cancer patients.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of histology and molecular biology in refining the prognostic value of surgical margins in head and neck oncology - A narrative review.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2025Article
- Molecular margins in head and neck cancer: Current techniques and future directions.Oral oncology · 2020Review
- Review
- Margin Analysis in Head and Neck Cancer: State of the Art and Future Directions.Annals of surgical oncology · 2019Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Immunohistochemical Expression of p16 with p16 Microsatellite Marker by PCR in Surgical Margins of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the association between microsatellite alteration in the surgical margins and local recurrence of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients. Surgical specimens confirmed by pathological examination and corresponding surgical margins were collected from 120 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients. Ten microsatellite markers were examined in the tumor specimens and paired surgical margins, which proved to be negative on pathological assessment. The specimens and surgical margins were amplified by polymerase chain reaction followed by computerized analysis. Forty-two specimens (35.0 %) with microsatellite instability (MSI) in at least one marker were found, and more than half of the specimens (n = 73, 60.8 %) had loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in at least one marker. Although MSI and LOH were not associated with the prognosis of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients, presence of MSI in the tumor-free surgical margins increased the risk of local recurrence (hazard ratio: 9.549; 95 % confidence interval: 4.143-22.01). Genetic analysis of tumor-free surgical margins is a useful tool for identifying oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients who are vulnerable to local recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.