Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27430219›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Post-acute pathways among hip fracture patients: a system-level analysis.

Kristen B Pitzul, Walter P Wodchis, Michael W Carter, Hans J Kreder, Jennifer Voth, Susan B Jaglal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Geriatric rehabilitation care after hip fracture.European geriatric medicine · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Discharge destination following hip fracture in Canada among previously community-dwelling older adults, 2004-2012: database study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Reporting and evaluating wait times for urgent hip fracture surgery in Ontario, Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Article
  20. Health Services Research in Rehabilitation and Disability-The Time is Now.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristen B PitzulInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G1V7, Canada. kristen.pitzul@mail.utoronto.ca.
Walter P WodchisInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G1V7, Canada.
Michael W CarterInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G1V7, Canada.
Hans J KrederInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G1V7, Canada.
Jennifer VothInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, Ontario, M5T3M6, Canada.
Susan B JaglalInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G1V7, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAUniversity of New Brunswick · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHip fractures among older adults are one of the leading causes of hospitalization and result in significant morbidity, mortality, and health care use. Guidelines suggest that rehabilitation after surgery is imperative to return patients to pre-morbid function. However, post-acute care (which encompasses rehabilitation) is currently delivered in a multitude of settings, and there is a lack of evidence with regards to which hip fracture patients should use which post-acute settings. The purpose of this study is to describe hip fracture patient characteristics and the most common post-acute pathways within a 1-year episode of care, and to examine how these vary regionally within a health system.

methodsThis study took place in the province of Ontario, Canada, which has 14 health regions and universal health coverage for all residents. Administrative health databases were used for analyses. Community-dwelling patients aged 66 and over admitted to an acute care hospital for hip fracture between April 2008 and March 2013 were identified. Patients' post-acute destinations within each region were retrieved by linking patients' records within various institutional databases using a unique encoded identifier. Post-acute pathways were then characterized by determining when each patient went to each post-acute destination within one year post-discharge from acute care. Differences in patient characteristics between regions were detected using standardized differences and p-values.

resultsThirty-six thousand twenty nine hip fracture patients were included. The study cohort was 71.9 % female with a mean age of 82.9 (±7.5SD). There was significant variation between regions with respect to the immediate post-acute discharge destination: four regions discharged a substantially higher proportion of their patients to inpatient rehabilitation compared to all others. However, the majority of patient characteristics between those four regions and all other regions did not significantly differ. There were 49 unique post-acute pathways taken by patients, with the largest proportion of patients admitted to either community-based or short-term institutionalized rehabilitation, regardless of region.

conclusionsThe observation that similar hip fracture patients are discharged to different post-acute settings calls into question both the appropriateness of care delivered in the post-acute period and health system expenditures. As policy makers continue to develop performance-based funding models to increase accountability of institutions in the provision of quality care to hip fracture patients, ensuring patients receive appropriate rehabilitative care is a priority for health system planning.

Indexed as

Systems AnalysisAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHip FracturesHospitalizationHumansInpatientsMaleOntarioPatient DischargeSubacute CareCare pathwaysHealth system planningHip fracturesRegional variationRehabilitationResource allocation

Identifiers

PMID27430219
PMCPMC4950780
OpenAlexW2500869109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.