Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27430027›Full record

ArticleParasite epidemiology and control2016

Evaluation and optimization of the Circulating Cathodic Antigen (POC-CCA) cassette test for detecting

Miriam Casacuberta, Safari Kinunghi, Birgitte J Vennervald, Annette Olsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite epidemiology and control, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Reproducibility matters: intra- and inter-sample variation of the point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen test in twoPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Validity of urine-CCA cassette test and indirect haem-agglutination assay (IHA) in the detection of schistosomiasis-Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Miriam CasacubertaParasitology and Aquatic Diseases, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 100, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Safari KinunghiNational Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Mwanza Research Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania).
Birgitte J VennervaldParasitology and Aquatic Diseases, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 100, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Annette OlsenParasitology and Aquatic Diseases, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 100, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKNational Institute for Medical Research · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for diagnostic techniques which are sensitive, specific, rapid and easy to perform at the point-of-care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Circulating Cathodic Antigen (POC-CCA) assay for

Indexed as

CCAComputer image analysesSchistosoma mansoniSchool childrenTanzania

Identifiers

PMID27430027
PMCPMC4946158
OpenAlexW2345140308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.